Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychosoc Oncol. 2018 Dec 22;37(2):242–263. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1510869

Table 4.

Means, Differences, Effect Sizes, and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) on Study Measures for Partners

Partners (N=28)
IE
(N=18)
LHT
(N=9)
Difference Effect Size
Mean
(95% CI)
Mean
(95% CI)
Mean
(95% CI)
Effect Size
(95% CI)
Sexual Outcomes and Coping
 Sexual Function – Male (IIEF) -- -- 7.83 (0.70, 14.96) 0.89 (0.05, 1.79)
  Baseline 49.42 (38.26, 60.59) 58.75 (47.68, 69.82) -- --
  Follow-up 54.68 (44.80, 64.56) 57.00 (42.83, 71.17) -- --
 Sexual Satisfaction (PROMIS SexFS) -- -- 2.83 (−1.68, 7.34) 0.52 (−0.31, 1.38)
  Baseline 44.78 (40.99, 48.58) 48.22 (41.24,55.25) -- --
  Follow-up 48.66(44.52, 52.80) 49.29 (40.27, 58.32) -- --
 Self-Efficacy -- -- 9.43 (−3.99, 22.85) 0.57 (−0.26, 1.43)
  Baseline 68.78 (56.32, 81.22) 75.19 (56.97, 93.40) --
  Follow-up 80.70 (72.68, 88.73) 74.58 (58.13, 91.03) --
Relationship Outcomes
 Sexual Communication (DSCS) -- -- 1.40 (−4.69, 7.50) 0.19 (−0.64, 1.03)
  Baseline 55.16 (49.06, 61.26) 53.67 (44.61, 62.72) -- --
  Follow-up 59.89 (54.31, 65.48) 57.00 (44.65, 69.35) -- --
 Emotional Intimacy (PAIR) -- -- −0.27 (−0.80, 0.26) −0.44 (−1.29, 0.39)
  Baseline 4.14 (3.91, 4.37) 3.91(3.21, 4.60) -- --
  Follow-up 4.00 (3.69, 4.31) 4.04 (3.52, 4.55) -- --
 Relationship Quality (DAS-7) -- -- 0.51 (−4.09, 5.12) 0.10 (−0.73, 0.93)
  Baseline 24.47 (22.61, 26.34) 26.00 (22.12, 29.88) -- --
  Follow-up 25.21 (23.51, 26.91) 26.22 (22.25, 30.19) -- --
Psychosocial Outcomes
 Cancer-related Distress (IES-R) -- -- −1.57 (−14.18, 11.05) −0.11 (−0.94, 0.72)
  Baseline 9.05 (2.70, 15.41) 15.56 (1.98, 29.13) -- --
  Follow-up 7.26 (2.27, 12.26) 15.33 (6.96, 23.71) -- --

This is the difference of IE versus LHT on change score (follow-up minus baseline on study measures) where positive difference means indicate scores in the IE group increased more on this measure than in the LHT group.