Table 2.
Species | Habitat | N (Bd positive) | Prevalence % (95% CI) | Genomic equivalents (±SE) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sarapiqui | Siquirres | Punta Banco | ||||
Agalychnis callidryas | Pond | 11 (5) | 45.5 (16.7–76.6) | x | 249.2 ± 214.1 | x |
Agalychnis lemur a | Pond | 5 (2) | 40.0 (5.3–85.3) | x | 12.3 ± 4.9 | x |
Agalychnis spurrelli | Pond | 5 (1) | 20.0 (5.0–71.6) | x | 10.3 ± 0.0 | x |
Anotheca spinosa | Forest | 1 (1) | 100.0 (0.2–100.0) | x | 112.3 ± 0.0 | x |
Boana rufitela | Pond | 10 (8) | 80.0 (44.4–97.5) | 8.4 ± 3.9 | x | x |
Bolitoglossa colonnea | Forest | 1 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–97.5) | x | x | x |
Centrolenella ilex | Stream | 1 (1) | 100.0 (0.2–10.00) | x | 57.4 ± 0.0 | x |
Cochranella granulosa | Stream | 1 (1) | 100.0 (0.2–100.0) | 3.9 ± 0.0 | x | x |
Craugastor bransfordi | Forest | 24 (19) | 79.2 (57.8–92.9) | 31.6 ± 13.8 | 74.9 ± 112.2 | x |
Craugastor crassidigitus | Forest | 6 (2) | 33.3 (4.3–77.7) | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 18.5 ± 0.0 | |
Craugastor fitzingeri | Forest | 44 (26) | 59.1 (43.2–73.7) | 448.8 ± 321.2 | 14.1 ± 5.6 | 65.4 ± 22.5 |
Craugastor megacephalus | Forest | 2 (1) | 50.0 (12.6–98.7) | 0.6 ± 0.0 | x | x |
Craugastor mimus | Forest | 10 (8) | 80.0 (44.4–97.5) | 107.5 ± 76.9 | x | x |
Craugastor stejnegerianus | Forest | 6 (2) | 33.3 (4.3–77.7) | x | x | 2.2 ± 0.9 |
Craugastor taurus a,b | Stream | 15 (12) | 80.0 (51.9–95.7) | x | x | 11,632.5 ± 6,285.2 |
Cruziohyla calcarifer | Forest | 1 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–97.5) | x | x | x |
Dendrobates auratus | Forest | 7 (1) | 14.3 (0.4–57.9) | x | 4.9 ± 0.0 | x |
Dendropsophus ebraccatus | Pond | 22 (15) | 68.2 (45.1–86.1) | x | 130.3 ± 59.1 | x |
Dendropsophus phlebodes | Pond | 1 (1) | 100.0 (0.2–10.0) | x | 15.9 ± 0.0 | x |
Diasporus diastema | Forest | 9 (4) | 44.4 (13.7–78.8) | x | 1994.3 ± 1724.7 | x |
Diasporus vocator | Forest | 1 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–97.5) | x | x | x |
Duellmanohyla rufioculis | Stream | 1 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–97.5) | x | x | x |
Engystomops pustulosus | Pond | 10 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–30.8) | x | x | x |
Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni | Stream | 1 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–97.5) | x | x | x |
Hyalinobatrachium valerioi | Stream | 1 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–97.5) | x | x | x |
Hyloscirtus palmeri | Stream | 1 (1) | 100.0 (0.2–100.0) | x | 231.2 ± 0.0 | x |
Incilius melanochlorus | Pond | 8 (1) | 12.5 (0.3–52.6) | 3.3 ± 0.0 | x | x |
Leptodactylus fragilis | Pond | 1 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–97.5) | x | x | x |
Leptodactylus insularum | Pond | 3 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–70.7) | x | x | x |
Leptodactylus poecilochilus | Pond | 1 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–97.5) | x | x | x |
Leptodactylus savagei | Pond | 3 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–70.7) | x | x | x |
Lithobates vaillanti | Pond | 2 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–84.2) | x | x | x |
Lithobates warszewitschii | Stream | 26 (14) | 53.8 (33.4–73.3) | 51.8 ± 39.1 | 1,391.1 ± 704.7 | x |
Oedipina gracilis | Forest | 1 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–97.5) | x | x | x |
Oophaga granulifera a | Forest | 1 (1) | 100.0 (0.2–100.0) | x | x | 114.0 ± 0.0 |
Oophaga pumilio | Forest | 23 (18) | 78.3 (56.3–92.5) | 625.2 ± 479.5 | x | x |
Pristimantis cerasinus | Forest | 7 (4) | 57.1 (18.4–90.1) | 3.6 ± 0.5 | x | x |
Pristimantis ridens | Forest | 6 (3) | 50.0 (11.8–88.2) | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 6.4 ± 3.2 | x |
Rhaebo haematiticus | Stream | 27 (17) | 63.0 (42.4–80.6) | 3.1 ± 0.8 | x | x |
Rhinella horribilis | Pond | 4 (0) | 0.0 (0.0–60.2) | x | x | x |
Scinax boulengeri | Pond | 4 (1) | 25.0 (63.1–80.6) | 195.2 ± 0.0 | x | x |
Scinax elaeochroa | Pond | 6 (3) | 50.0 (11.8–88.2) | x | 2.3 ± 0.4 | x |
Smilisca phaeota | Pond | 5 (2) | 40.0 (5.3–85.3) | x | 9.8 ± 2.3 | x |
Smilisca sordida | Stream | 1 (1) | 100.0 (0.2–100.0) | 430.4 ± 0.0 | x | x |
Tlalocohyla loquax | Pond | 15 (11) | 73.3 (44.9–92.2) | x | 1,566.8 ± 1,020.7 | x |
Teratohyla spinosa | Stream | 4 (2) | 50.0 (6.8–93.2) | 4.8 ± 1.2 | x | x |
Teratohyla pulverata | Stream | 3 (1) | 33.3 (84.0–90.6) | x | 39.8 ± 0.0 | x |
Total | 348 (190) | 54.6 (49.2–59.9) |
For every species, the table shows the habitat where the species was captured, the sample size, the overall prevalence (95% CI), and the average (SE) of genomic equivalents of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis zoospores quantified per study site estimated from Bd‐positive samples.
Endangered species according the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
Prevalence value previously reported in Chaves et al. (2014).