Table 2.
Spot No. | Candidate marker | 1st sample set (CON n = 30, SCZ n = 30) | 2nd sample set (CON n = 30, SCZ n = 30) | Combinede (CON n = 60, SCZ n = 60) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCa | t-test P-valueb | Logistic regression analysis | FC | t-test P-value | Logistic regression analysis | FC | t-test P-value | Logistic regression analysis | |||||||||||
OR | P-value | AUC | OR | P-value | AUC | OR | P-value | AUC | |||||||||||
1 | KIF11 | 1.31 | 0.284 | (S) | 2.10 | 0.289 | 0.63 | ||||||||||||
2 | HSPA4L | 0.62 | 0.017 | (W) | 0.50 | 0.029 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.015 | (W) | 0.05 | 0.021 | 0.65 | 0.65 | <0.001 | (W) | 0.59 | 0.03 | 0.61 |
3 | HSP90AB1 | 1.12 | 0.390 | (S) | 1.45 | 0.384 | 0.57 | ||||||||||||
PDXDC1 | 1.10 | 0.604 | (S) | 1.15 | 0.598 | 0.49 | |||||||||||||
4 | VPS35 | 0.88 | 0.295 | (S) | 0.39 | 0.296 | 0.55 | ||||||||||||
5, 6, 7 | MX1 | 1.39 | 0.006 | (S) | 9.26 | 0.011 | 0.72 | 1.32 | 0.006 | (W) | 12.76 | 0.012 | 0.68 | 1.35 | <0.001 | (W) | 10.32 | <0.001 | 0.70 |
8 | LCP1 | 1.04 | 0.791 | (S) | 1.07 | 0.787 | 0.54 | ||||||||||||
9 | HARS | 1.09 | 0.588 | (S) | 1.55 | 0.582 | 0.57 | ||||||||||||
10 | GLRX3 | 0.74 | 0.002 | (W) | 0.05 | 0.006 | 0.73 | 1.12 | 0.103 | (S) | 13.31 | 0.106 | 0.61 | 0.88 | 0.073 | (S) | 0.33 | 0.08 | 0.55 |
11 | UROD | 0.77 | 0.010 | (S) | 0.24 | 0.018 | 0.73 | 1.03 | 0.824 | (W) | 1.17 | 0.828 | 0.54 | 0.85 | 0.118 | (S) | 0.60 | 0.12 | 0.59 |
12 | PPA1 | 0.99 | 0.953 | (S) | 0.97 | 0.952 | 0.50 | ||||||||||||
13 | ANXA5 | 0.88 | 0.105 | (W) | 0.32 | 0.109 | 0.61 | ||||||||||||
14 | MAPRE1 | 0.76 | 0.009 | (S) | 0.20 | 0.015 | 0.69 | 1.18 | 0.010 | (S) | 95.47 | 0.015 | 0.68 | 0.89 | 0.182 | (S) | 0.57 | 0.19 | 0.51 |
EFHD2 | 0.99 | 0.908 | (S) | 0.95 | 0.906 | 0.47 | |||||||||||||
TBCB | 0.68 | 0.024 | (W) | 0.20 | 0.034 | 0.66 | 0.95 | 0.628 | (S) | 0.68 | 0.622 | 0.57 | 0.82 | 0.035 | (S) | 0.36 | 0.04 | 0.60 | |
15 | UCHL1 | 0.97 | 0.919 | (S) | 0.99 | 0.917 | 0.54 | ||||||||||||
16 | APRT | 0.59 | 0.248 | (W) | 0.90 | 0.356 | 0.49 | ||||||||||||
17 | IGHM | 1.80 | 0.037 | (W) | 5.03 | 0.050 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.336 | (W) | 0.98 | 0.336 | 0.49 | 0.80 | 0.466 | (S) | 0.98 | 0.46 | 0.45 |
18 | GART | 0.75 | 0.022 | (S) | 0.15 | 0.031 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.002 | (S) | 0.02 | 0.005 | 0.74 | 0.74 | <0.001 | (W) | 0.08 | <0.001 | 0.70 |
19 | EEF1G | 1.16 | 0.154 | (S) | 2.35 | 0.158 | 0.65 | ||||||||||||
20 | LACTB2 | 1.10 | 0.358 | (S) | 1.76 | 0.356 | 0.56 | ||||||||||||
TATDN1 | 1.14 | 0.195 | (W) | 2.58 | 0.210 | 0.57 |
FC fold change, OR odds ratio (SCZ/CON), AUC the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, Combined combined results of 1st sample set and 2nd sample set
aFC = the ratio of the average intensity (SCZ/CON)
bt-test P-value: the differentially expressed proteins were determined by Student’s t-test (S) or Welch’s t-test (W) (unpaired, two tailed)