Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 16;9:282. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00282

Table 2.

Comparison between modeling group and validation group by clinicopathological characteristics.

Variable N Modeling Validation P-value
population % population %
No. of cases 633 500 133
Age 0.892
<40 52 42 80.80 10 18.20
40–70 547 432 79.00 115 21.00
>70 34 26 76.50 8 5.40
Tumor location 0.178
UOQ 313 241 77.00 72 23.00
LOQ 47 42 89.40 5 10.60
UIQ 127 96 75.60 31 24.40
LIQ 42 36 85.70 6 4.30
Central 104 85 81.70 19 18.30
Tumor type 0.439
Ductal 609 483 79.3 126 20.70
Lobular 10 6 60.00 4 40.00
Mixed 10 7 70.00 3 30.00
Mucinous 3 3 100.00 0 0.00
Medullary 1 1 100.00 0 0.00
Clinical stage 0.270
I 191 157 82.20 34 17.80
II 440 342 77.70 98 22.30
III 2 1 50.00 1 50.00
Pathological grade 0.899
1 17 13 76.50 4 23.50
2 582 461 79.20 161 20.80
3 34 26 76.50 8 23.50
ER 0.353
Present 481 384 79.80 97 20.20
Absent 152 116 76.30 36 23.70
PR 0.234
Present 427 343 80.30 84 19.70
Absent 206 157 76.20 49 23.80
HER2 0.802
Present 88 71 80.70 17 19.30
Absent 545 427 78.80 115 21.20
Ki67 0.960
Present 392 148 37.76 244 62.24
Absent 241 79 32.78 162 67.22
Breast gland content 0.769
<25% 99 82 82.80 17 17.20
26–50% 184 144 78.30 40 21.70
51–75% 305 238 78.00 67 22.00
>75% 45 36 80.00 9 20.00
Tumor morphology 0.056
Lump 378 311 82.33 67 17.70
Mass with calcification 96 70 72.90 26 27.10
No mass 159 119 74.80 40 25.20
SLN 0.073
Present 227 170 74.90 57 24.10
Absent 406 330 81.30 76 18.70