Table 3.
Participant gender | Dependent measure | Leadership potential | Leadership performance | Overall | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female candidate | Female | Candidate hiring | 7.16 (0.15) | 7.68 (0.13) | 7.42 (0.11) |
Expected success | 7.47 (0.11) | 7.84 (0.10) | 7.65 (0.09) | ||
Male | Candidate hiring | 6.78 (0.20) | 7.39 (0.17) | 7.09 (0.15) | |
Expected success | 7.33 (0.15) | 7.60 (0.13) | 7.47 (0.12) | ||
Overall | Candidate hiring | 6.97 (0.13) | 7.54 (0.11) | 7.25 (0.09) | |
Expected success | 7.40 (0.09) | 7.72 (0.08) | 7.56 (0.08) | ||
Male candidate | Female | Candidate hiring | 7.41 (0.15) | 7.57 (0.14) | 7.49 (0.12) |
Expected success | 7.78 (0.10) | 7.80 (0.10) | 7.79 (0.09) | ||
Male | Candidate hiring | 7.03 (0.20) | 7.33 (0.18) | 7.18 (0.15) | |
Expected success | 7.36 (0.13) | 7.73 (0.13) | 7.55 (0.11) | ||
Overall | Candidate hiring | 7.22 (0.12) | 7.45 (0.11) | 7.33 (0.10) | |
Expected success | 7.57 (0.08) | 7.77 (0.08) | 7.67 (0.07) | ||
Candidate gender collapsed | Female | Candidate hiring | 7.29 (0.13) | 7.63 (0.11) | 7.46 (0.10) |
Expected success | 7.62 (0.09) | 7.82 (0.08) | 7.72 (0.08) | ||
Male | Candidate hiring | 6.90 (0.17) | 7.36 (0.14) | 7.13 (0.13) | |
Expected success | 7.35 (0.12) | 7.67 (0.11) | 7.51 (0.10) | ||
Overall | Candidate hiring | 7.10 (0.11) | 7.49 (0.09) | ||
Expected success | 7.48 (0.08) | 7.74 (0.07) |