Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 16;10:430. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00430

Table 5.

Explained between study heterogeneity (EH) by selected variables from univariate and multivariate meta-regression for high and extreme altitudes.

Model N PMC in BW EH p value N PMC in FFM EH p value N PMD in FM EH p value
(in kg with 95% CI) (in kg with 95% CI) (in kg with 95% CI)
High altitude Univariate
Manipulation of diet/
hypocaloric diet
38 1.00 (-0.27, 2.27) 21% 0.12 14 0.60 (-0.53, 1.73) 42% 0.26 13 0.91 (-0.91, 2.74) 25% 0.29
–4.47 (-7.50, -1.44) <0.01 –2.32 (-4.32, -0.33) 0.03 –2.45 (-5.31, -0.41) 0.09
Duration (days) 38 –0.08 (-0.16, -0.12) 20% 0.02 n.s. n.s.
Baseline bodyweight 37 –0.08 (-0.17, -0.02) 0.4% 0.13 n.s. n.s.
Sex (male) 38 –0.02 (-0.042, -0.003) 13% 0.02 13 –0.02 (-0.03, -0.003) 66% 0.02 n.s.
Exposure (active) n.s. n.s. 13 –1.65 (-3.27, -0.04) 30% 0.05
Multivariate 38 35% 13 42%
Manipulation of diet/ 0.94 (-0.25, 2.12) 0.12 Insufficient no. of observations
hypocaloric diet –4.01 (-6.96, -1.06) <0.01
Duration (days) –0.07 (-0.14,.004) 0.05
Sex (male) –0.02 (-0.05,.006) 0.11
Exposure (active) –2.19 (-3.86, -0.53) 0.04
Extreme altitude Univariate
Duration (days) 11 –0.05 (-0.12, -0.02) 14% 0.12 n.s. 6 –0.04 (-0.11, 0.03) 42% 0.14
Baseline bodyweight 8 –0.53 (-0.86, -0.21) 84% <0.05 n.s. n.s.
Age (years) n.s. n.s. –0.22 (-0.41, -0.02) 77% 0.04
Multivariate 8 84% Insufficient no. of observations Insufficient no. of observations
Duration (days) –0.01 (-0.09, 0.07) 0.65
Baseline bodyweight –0.43 (-0.92, -0.05) 0.07
Altitude (per 1000 m) –1.10 (-5.17, 2.98) 0.50

Univariate, univariate meta-regression results; multivariate, multivariate meta-regression results; N, number of observations; PMC, pooled mean change; EH, explained heterogeneity in percentage; BW, body weight; FFM, fat free mass; FM, fat mass; MM muscle mass; moderate altitude (1500-3500 m), high altitude (3500-5300 m), extreme altitude (>5300 m); n.s., non-significant results for selected variable in meta-regression analysis; Manipulation of diet/hypocaloric diet was analyzed as one single covariate and compared to non-manipulation of diet; exposure, compared to passive exposure.