Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;2012(11):CD004082. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004082.pub5

Van der Linden 2010.

Methods RCT
Single centre
Participants 37 patients
3‐arm study
High risk (ASA II‐III)
Peripheral artery bypass grafting
Interventions Intraoperative
Fluids and Inotropes (dobutamine)
FloTrac Vigileo monitor
Goal = CI
Outcomes Mortality
HLOS
Complications (infections)
Notes The study comprised of 3 groups. Group 1: controls, Group 2: goal directed therapy and Group 3: goal directed therapy with different anaesthetic compared to group 1 and 2. As Group 3 was not matched with controls this was not included in the analysis.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Patients were randomly assigned to three groups using computer generated random code"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "The assignment was concealed in an envelope"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "The attending anaesthesiologist was blinded for the data displayed by the Vigileo monitor. Cardiac index data in these patients were recorded by an independent observer who was not involved in the patients treatment"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Data were analysed blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All expected outcomes were reported
Other bias Low risk No other potential sources of bias identified