Van der Linden 2010.
Methods | RCT Single centre |
|
Participants | 37 patients 3‐arm study High risk (ASA II‐III) Peripheral artery bypass grafting |
|
Interventions | Intraoperative Fluids and Inotropes (dobutamine) FloTrac Vigileo monitor Goal = CI |
|
Outcomes | Mortality HLOS Complications (infections) |
|
Notes | The study comprised of 3 groups. Group 1: controls, Group 2: goal directed therapy and Group 3: goal directed therapy with different anaesthetic compared to group 1 and 2. As Group 3 was not matched with controls this was not included in the analysis. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "Patients were randomly assigned to three groups using computer generated random code" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | "The assignment was concealed in an envelope" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "The attending anaesthesiologist was blinded for the data displayed by the Vigileo monitor. Cardiac index data in these patients were recorded by an independent observer who was not involved in the patients treatment" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Data were analysed blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All expected outcomes were reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No other potential sources of bias identified |