Ren 2015.
Methods | Design: parallel (2 arms) Country: China Multisite: no International: no Treatment duration: 1 dose Follow up: 5 days Rate of ascent (m/h): unclear Final altitude reached: 3650 m AMS scale: Lake Louise score |
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions |
Iron group (Intervention A) = intravenous iron hydroxide sucrose dose of 200 mg in 100 ml saline (Venofer, Impfstoffwerk Dessau‐Tornau GmbH, Germany), at Day 0 Placebo group (Control group) = 100 ml normal saline at Day 0 |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcome
Secondary outcomes
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to score this item as low or high risk of bias Quote: "this was a perspective, randomized, double‐blinded, placebo controlled study" Page 2051 |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "each participant was attributed a computer‐generated 4‐digit serial number with the grouping information hidden in the third digit, which was blinded to both participants and researchers" Page 2051 |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "drug administration was carried out by nurses blinded to the study, and iron supplement and placebo were injected in separate rooms. Intravenous fluids containing drug or saline were labelled with the serial number; because the drug solution was not clear, a brown light‐shading infusion apparatus (Weigao Medical Group, Weihai, China) was used to mask the grouping. Nurses performed injections according to serial number of participants and I.V. fluid labels" Page 2051 |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to score this item as low or high risk of bias |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 3 patients were lost at follow‐up (7%) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No selective reporting was identified |
Other bias | Low risk | No other biases were identified |