Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr-Jun;9(2):89–94. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_128_18

Table 3.

The frequency, percentage, and distribution of big-toe length with respect to parental combination

Parents big-toe length combinations Total number of offspring (%)
Male offspring
Female offspring
LBT SBT Total LBT SBT Total LBT SBT Total
Long big-toe length in both parents 52 (81) 12 (19) 64 (47) 24 6 30 28 6 34
 Expected outcome (if long big-toe length is dominant) 48 16
 Expected outcome (if short big-toe length is dominant) 0 64
Short big-toe length in both parents 3 (18) 14 (82) 17 (13) 1 8 9 2 6 8
 Expected outcome (if long big-toe length is dominant) 0 17
 Expected outcome (if short big-toe length is dominant) 4.25 12.75
Long in father and short in mother 15 (60) 10 (40) 25 (19) 7 5 12 8 5 13
 Expected outcome (if long big-toe length is dominant) 18.75 6.25
 Expected outcome (if short big-toe length is dominant) 6.25 18.75
Short in father and long in mother 14 (48) 15 (52) 29 (21) 7 10 17 7 5 12
 Expected outcome (if long big-toe length is dominant) 14.5 14.5
 Expected outcome (if short big-toe length is dominant) 14.5 14.5
Total 84 (62) 51 (38) 135 39 29 68 45 22 67

LBT: Longer big toe; SBT: Shorter big toe