Table 4. Comparison of outcomes and service use at 6-month follow-up among minority participants in Community Partners in Care, by intervention group from intervention-by-ethnicity interaction model ^a.

	Any Latino		Black (non-Latino)		Interaction effects
	CEP vs RS		CEP vs RS
	OR (95% CI)	P	OR (95% CI)	P	P
Poor mental health quality of life	.80 (.53, 1.20)	.266	.62 (.41, .95)	.029	.403
PHQ-9 ≥10	.98 (.51, 1.90)	.955	.68 (.36, 1.29)	.219	.350
Mental wellness	1.82 (1.06, 3.14)	.032	1.40 (.85, 2.31)	.177	.442
Physically active	1.53 (.94, 2.51)	.085	1.29 (.89, 1.87)	.168	.569
Chronic homelessness risk	.70 (.37, 1.33)	.257	.61 (.36, 1.03)	.064	.710
Any behavioral health hospitalizations	.41 (.09, 1.77)	.214	.52 (.23, 1.18)	.115	.788
	IRR (95% CI)		IRR (95% CI)
# Health care sector visits for depression	1.09 (.55, 2.16)	.799	.91 (.46, 1.79)	.761	.648
# Community sector visit for depression	2.17 (.58, 8.16)	.218	1.04 (.38, 2.86)	.933	.434
# Religious services for depression	2.95 (.85, 10.22)	.086	2.90 (1.40, 6.01)	.005	.981

a. Intervention-by-ethnicity interaction models used multiply imputed data, weighted for eligible sample for enrollment; logistic regression models for binary variables (presented as odds ratio, OR) or Poisson regression models for count variables (presented as incidence rate ratios, IRR), adjusted for baseline status of the dependent variable, age, education, 12-month depressive disorder, and community and accounted for the design effect of the cluster randomization.