Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 21;2017(4):CD011917. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011917.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Anonymous 1991 Not randomised
Anraku 2006 Review (to be clarified)
Bychkov 2001 Wrong intervention
Candel 2009 Review
Clemente 2013 Review
Coolen 1995 Retrospective
Crisci 1989 Not randomised
Cui 1994 Retrospective
Davis 1993 Not randomised
de Antonio 2006 Not randomised
Dusmet 2004 Review
Eguchi 1988 Review
Eichhorn 1975 Wrong intervention
Elias 1993 Wrong intervention
Friedberg 2012 Review
Fujimori 1997 Wrong study design
Fujimura 2001 Review
Gatzemeier 1986 Not randomised
Graham 1993 Review
Grants 1989 Not randomised
Greschuchna 1978 Retrospective
Gridelli 1994 Not randomised
Gridelli 1994a Not randomised
Hansen 1984 Review
Hara 1988 Retrospective
Hara 1991a Not randomised
Hara 1991b Retrospective
Ju 2012 Retrospective
Karrer 1978 Review
Karrer 1982a Review
Karrer 1982b Duplicate
Karrer 1986 Review
Karrer 1987 Wrong intervention
Karrer 1988 Wrong intervention
Karrer 1989a Wrong intervention
Karrer 1989b Duplicate
Karrer 1990 Wrong intervention
Karrer 1995 Wrong intervention
Kobayashi 1988 Not randomised
Kodama 1998 Review
Krishnamurthy 2011 Not randomised
Lad 1991 Duplicate
Lad 1994b Duplicate
Lagerwaard 2010 Wrong participant population
Lassen 1999 Review
Lewinski 2001 Not randomised
Lexer 1988 Not randomised
Li 2010 Not randomised
Lucchi 1997 Retrospective
Lukianski 1988 Not randomised
Macchiarini 1989a Retrospective
Macchiarini 1989b Duplicate
Namikawa 1988 Not randomised
Osterlind 1986a Wrong intervention
Osterlind 1986b Not randomised
Prager 1984 Not randomised
Rea 1998 Wrong intervention
Schamanek 1994 Wrong intervention
Shepherd 1983 Retrospective
Shepherd 1989 Retrospective
Shepherd 1991 Not randomised
Sorenson 1981 Review
Szczesny 2003 Review
Theuer 1992 Review
Tsuchiya 2005 Wrong intervention
Ulsperger 1990 Duplicate
Ulsperger 1991 Duplicate
Veronesi 2007 Not randomised
Watanabe 1988 Not randomised
Yamaguchi 1988 Not randomised