Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 12;2017(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5

11. Satisfaction with the choice.

Study Scale used Timing N decisionaid Decision aid ‐ mean N comparison Comparison ‐ mean Notes
Heller 2008 1‐item; pleased with treatment choice 1 month postsurgery 62/66 55/67 P = 0.03
Legare 2012 (in consult) Single question Likert scale to assess the quality of the decision made (0 = very low quality; 10 = very high quality) Immediately post 162 8.54 (SD 1.56) 159 8.53 (SD 1.51) No difference; MD 0.0 (95% CI −0.4 to 0.4)
Leighl 2011 Satisfaction with decision scale:
median (range)
1 month postintervention 107 22 (13‐25) 100 21(15‐25) No difference
Marteau 2010 Scale: ranging from 1−7 and standardized out 100 4 weeks 91.17 (SD 14) 91.33 (SD 14.50) No difference
Schwartz 2009b 6‐item 1, 6, 12 months 100 114 Overall, no difference between groups; decision aid led to significantly increased satisfaction compared to usual care among those who were undecided at randomization but not among those who had made a decision before randomization; (only graph in paper with no raw data)
Taylor 2006 Single item ‐ "Are you satisfied with your decision about prostate cancer testing? 1 month 80 79.7% 74 75.7%
Trevena 2008 Satisfaction with the decision Immediately post 134 137 No difference (P = 0.56)
Williams 2013 6‐item Satisfaction with Decision Scale Baseline > 95% > 95%

DA: decision aid.