12. Satisfaction with the decision‐making process.

Study	Scale used	Timing	N decisionaid	Decision aid ‐ mean	N comparison	Comparison ‐ mean	Notes
Satisfaction with the decision‐making process
Hess 2012 (in consult)	Satisfaction with decision process (0 for strongly agree to 5 for strongly disagree)	—	101	—	103	—	Patients in DA group reported greater satisfaction with the DM process (strongly agree, 61% DA vs 40% usual care)
Vodermaier 2009	Satisfied with process	1 week follow‐up	53	42	56	50	High satisfaction with no difference by group
Satisfaction with participating in decision making
Kennedy 2002	Measured satisfaction with opportunities to participate in decision making using a single item	—	—	—	—	—	Compared to usual care, women who received the decision aid followed by nurse coaching were significantly more satisfied with the opportunities to participate in decision making (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.0).
Satisfaction with the information provided
LeBlanc 2015 (in consult)	Amount of information was just right	Postconsultation	29	25 (86%)	37	34 (92%)	P = 0.69
	Information received was clear	Postconsultation	27	17 (63%)	36	26 (72%)	P = 0.43
	Information received was helpful	Postconsultation	28	21 (75%)	34	23 (68%)	P = 0.53
	Would recommend method to others	Postconsultation	28	24 (86%)	35	27 (77%)	P = 0.52
Laupacis 2006	Satisfaction with information received subscale 4‐item (0 to 100; low to high)	Average 10 days	54	76 (15.5 SD)	56	59 (23.3 SD)	P = 0.001
Montori 2011 (in consult)	(7 point scales) Participants' satisfaction with knowledge transfer Amount of information Clarity of information Helpfulness of the information Would want other decisions Recommend to others	Postintervention	49	6.6 6 6 6.1 6.4	46	6.3 6 5.8 5.8 6.2	P = 0.798 P = 0.296 P = 0.624 P = 0.248 P = 0.435
	Clinicians' satisfaction with knowledge transfer Helpfulness of the information Would want other decisions Recommend to others	Postintervention	39	5.8 6.1 5.9	33	5.2 4.9 4.8	P = 0.006 P < 0.001 P < 0.001
Oakley 2006	Satisfaction with information about medicines	4 months post	16	10.4 (SD 2.9)	17	10.1 (SD 2.2)	No difference
Satisfaction with the clinician
Laupacis 2006	Satisfaction with practitioner treatment during decision process subscale 4‐item (0 to 100; low to high)	Average 10 days	54	69 (25.3 SD)	56	54 (26.7 SD)	P = 0.004
Miller 2005	Satisfaction with cancer information service 1‐item (1 to 5; low to high)	2 weeks	—	4.37 (0.84 SD)	—	4.38 (0.86 SD)	No difference
		6 months	—	4.51 (0.75 SD)	—	4.51 (0.64 SD)	No difference
Vodermaier 2009	Physician helped me understand Physician understood important to me Physician answered questions Satisfied with involvement Satisfied with physician's involvement	1 week follow‐up	53	49 (92.5%) 47 47 44 36	56	53 (94.6%) 50 51 45 36	High satisfaction with no difference by group

DA: decision aid; SD: standard deviation.