Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 12;2017(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5

14. Choice.

Study Type of comparison N decisionaid Decision aid ‐ mean N comparison Comparison ‐ mean Notes
Surgery ‐ elective more minor surgery
Hanson 2011 Actual choice (feeding tube) 127 1 129 3 No difference
Wong 2006 Actual choice (abortion) No difference
Screening ‐ breast cancer genetic testing
Miller 2005 Preference Intervention decreased intention for genetic testing in women at average risk; increased in women at high risk
Screening ‐ breast screening
Mathieu 2007 Actual choice No difference in women who participated in screening within 1 month
Mathieu 2010 Preference of women who were decided 96 52% 127 65% P = 0.05
Screening ‐ cardiac stress testing
Hess 2012 (in consult) Actual choice 101 58% 100 77% P < 0.001
Screening ‐ diabetes
Marteau 2010 Actual choice 633 353 639 368 P = 0.51
Mann E 2010 Preference 273 134 No difference
Screening ‐ prenatal
Bekker 2004 (in consult) Actual choice No difference
Nagle 2008 Actual choice No difference
Screening ‐ prostate cancer testing
Frosch 2008a Actual choice The experimental interventions led to significant reductions in requests for prostate‐specific antigen tests ( ˜2 times greater decline).
Lepore 2012 Actual choice
2 years postintervention
215 62.7% 216 66.7% No difference
Exp (B) = 0.829
CI 95% 0.564 to 1.218
Williams 2013 Actual choice No difference (P > 0.3)
Lepore 2012 Preference 215 80.9% 216 80.1% No difference
Exp (B) = 0.994
95% CI 0.614 to 1.610
Diagnostic testing ‐ prenatal genetic testing
Kuppermann 2014 Invasive diagnostic testing without screening test 357 11 (3.0%) 353 16 (4.6%) P = 0.37
Screening test followed by invasive diagnostic test 357 10 (2.9%) 353 27 (7.7%) Not reported
Medication ‐ antibiotics for upper respiratory infections
Legare 2011 (in consult) Actual choice 81 33 70 49 P = 0.08
Legare 2012 (in consult) Actual choice 27.2% 52.2% Absolute difference 25.0; RR 0.5 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.7)
Medication ‐ atrial fibrillation anti‐thrombosis ‐ uptake
Man‐Son‐Hing 1999 Actual choice 25% decrease in DA group, not statistically significant
McAlister 2005 Actual choice No difference
Thomson 2007 (in consult) Actual choice 93.8% 25% RR 0.27 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.63)
Medication ‐ breast cancer prevention
Fagerlin 2011 Actual choice 383 0.5% 102 0% No difference
Medication ‐ cardiovascular disease prevention
Sheridan 2011 DA versus usual care. Any effective CHD risk reducing strategy 79 63% 78 42% Absolute difference 21%, 95% CI 5 to 37
Blood pressure medication, if hypertensive (n = 55) 26% 29% Absolute difference −3%, 95% CI −30 to 25
Cholesterol medication, if abnormal cholesterol (n = 69) 39% 9% Absolute difference 30%, 95% CI 14 to 46
Smoking cessation, if smoking (n = 21) 80% 50% Absolute difference 30%, 95% CI −16 to 76
Aspirin, if CHD risk > 6% (n = 140) 43% 24% Absolute difference 19%, 95% CI −1 to 39
Diet low in saturated fat 79 29% 78 40% Absolute difference −11%, 95% CI −27 to 6
Regular exercise 79 53% 78 54% Absolute difference −1%, 95% CI −17 to 16
Medication ‐ chemotherapy
Leighl 2011 For advanced cancer 107 77% 100 71% No difference
Whelan 2003 (in consult) For early breast cancer No difference
Medication ‐ diabetes management insulin
Mathers 2012 Preference for insulin 92 18.5% 78 11.5% P = 0.41
Medication ‐ hypertension
Montgomery 2003 Uptake No difference
Medication ‐ menopausal symptom treatment
Murray 2001b Uptake hormone therapy 8% decrease in DA group, not statistically significant
Legare 2008a preference for natural health products   41%   41% No difference
Medication ‐ multiple sclerosis immunotherapy
Kasper 2008 Uptake No difference
Medication ‐ osteoporosis
LeBlanc 2015 (in consult) Preference 29 12 (41%) 38 11 (29%) P = 0.57
Prescription during encounter 29 13 (41%) 38 12 (27%) P = 0.2
Montori 2011 (in consult) Uptake 52 44% 48 40% No difference
Mental health treatment
Hamann 2006 Uptake prescribed medication No difference
Hamann 2006 Uptake psychoeducation Higher uptake in DA group (P = 0.003)
Mott 2014 Uptake of 9 psychoeducation sessions 9 44% 11 9% All 4 decision aid participants received 9 or more sessions. 1 of 5 usual care received 9 or more sessions.
Obstetrics ‐ birth control method
Langston 2010 Preference 114 108 No difference in the methods chosen between groups, participants in the intervention group were not more likely to initiate the requested method immediately compared to those in
 the usual care group (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.34)
Obstetric ‐ childbirth procedure
Montgomery 2007 Uptake No difference
Nassar 2007 Uptake No difference
Shorten 2005 preference No difference
Obstetric ‐ embryo transplant
Van Peperstraten 2010 ‐ single embryo transfer Uptake 152 43% 156 32% P = 0.05
Other‐ lung transplant referral
Vandemheen 2009   No difference
Other ‐ pre‐operative blood transfusion
Laupacis 2006 Uptake No difference
Other ‐ pelvic organ prolapse treatment
Brazell 2014 Uptake No difference; P = 0.835
Other ‐ thyroid cancer adjuvant radioactive iodine treatment
Sawka 2012 Preferred treatment Immediately post 37 35.1% 37 32.4%
Uptake at follow‐up (˜ 6.3 months post) 37 29.7% 37 18.9% No difference.
(Chi2=1.18; df = 1; P = 0.28)
Vaccines
Chambers 2012 Uptake flu shot 48 46% 59 27% No difference
Clancy 1988 Uptake hepatitis B Significant increase of 76% in the DA group
Shourie 2013 Measles, mumps, rubella in infant 48 48 (100%) 71 70 (99%) No difference

CHD: congenital heart disease;DA: decision aid; OR: odds ratio; RR: risk ratio.