Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 12;2017(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5

23. Healthcare system effects.

Study Scale used N decisionaid Decision aid ‐ mean N comparison Comparison ‐ mean Difference between groups Notes
Consultation length
Bekker 2004 (in consultation) Consultation length using DA in the consultation (minutes) 50 32.2 (SD 13.0) 56 26.3 (SD 11.5) + 5.9 minutes P = 0.01 (longer with decision aid)
Bozic 2013 Consultation length with practitioner post‐DA (minutes) 61 20.9 (SD 6.8) 62 21.0 (SD 7.2) −0.1 minutes No difference; P = 0.91
Krist 2007 Time spent discussing prostate cancer with practitioner post‐DA (minutes) ‐ patient reported 196 5.3 75 5.2 + 0.1 minutes No difference between groups
Time spent discussing prostate cancer with practitioner post‐DA (minutes) ‐ physician reported 196 3.8 75 4.2 −0.4 minutes No difference between groups but physicians thought they spent less time than patients (P < 0.001)
LeBlanc 2015 (in consultation) Consultation length with practitioner using DA in consultation (median, range in minutes) 29 11.5 (5.4 to 21.4) 37 10.7 (2.5 to 54.9) + 0.8 minutes (−33.6 to 3.0)
Loh 2007 (in consultation) Consultation length using DA in consultation (minutes) 191 29.2 (10.7) 96 26.7 (12.5) +2.5 minutes P = 0.681
Ozanne 2007 (in consultation) Consultation length using DA in consultation (minutes) 15 24 15 21 +3 minutes P = 0.42
Thomson 2007 (in consultation) Consultation length using DA in consultation (minutes) 8 44 (39 to 55) 10 21 (19 to 26) +23 minutes P = 0.001
Compared computerized decision aid with standard gamble within the consultation to guideline driven consultation
Vodermaier 2009 Consultation length with practitioner post‐DA
5 to 10 min 53 6 (11.3%) 54 5 (9.3%) P = 0.91
10 to 15 min 17 (32.1%) 19 (35.2%)
15 to 25 min 15 (28.3%) 14 (25.9%)
25 to 35 min 7 (13.2%) 5 (9.3%)
Above 35 min 8 (15.1%) 11 (20.4%)
Whelan 2003 (in consultation) Consultation length using DA in consultation (minutes) 50 68.3 50 65.7 + 2.6 minutes P = 0.53
Weymiller 2007 (in consultation) Consultation length using DA in consultation (minutes) 52 46 + 3.8 minutes in DA group Not statistically significant
3.8 min (95% CI −2.9 to 10.5)
Cost and resource use
Hollinghurst 2010; Montgomery 2007 Total costs in the UK for decision about mode of delivery post previous cesarean 235 GBP 2019 (SD 741) 238 GBP 2033 (SD 677) No difference
Kennedy 2002 Cost‐effectiveness in the UK for decision about benign heavy menstruation 296
300
USD 2026 (DA alone)
USD 1556
(DA plus nurse coaching
298 USD 2751 Mean differences:
DA versus usual care
USD 461 (95% CI 236 to 696)
DA plus coaching versus usual care
USD 1184 (95% CI 684 to 2110)
Murray 2001a Total costs excluding intervention in the UK for decision about treatment of benign enlarged prostate 57 GBP 310.3 (SD 602.0) 48 GBP 188.8 (SD 300.4) Mean difference GBP 121.5 (95% CI −58.9 to 302.0)
Total costs including intervention (interactive video disk equipment) in the UK for decision about treatment of benign enlarged prostate 57 GBP 594.10 (SD 602) 48 GBP 188.8 (SD 300.4) Mean difference GBP 405.4 (95% CI GBP 224.9 to GBP 585.8)
P < 0.001
Murray 2001b Total costs excluding intervention in the UK for decision about hormone replacement therapy 85 GBP 90.5 84 GBP 90.9 (SD 39.2) No difference
Total costs including intervention (interactive video disk equipment) in the UK for decision about hormone replacement therapy 85 GBP 306.5 (SD 42.8) 84 GBP 90.9 (SD 39.2) Mean difference GBP 215.5 (95% CI 203.1 to 228.0) P < 0.001
Van Peperstraten 2010 Mean total savings per couple in the Netherlands for decision about embryo transfer for invitro fertilization Mean total saving per couple in the intervention group were EUR 169.75 (USD 219.12)
Vuorma 2003 Total estimated costs in Finland for treatment decision about heavy benign menstruation 184 EUR 2760 179 EUR 3094 P = 0.1
No difference between intervention and control
Resource use
Legare 2012 (in consultation) Repeat consultation for the same reason, n (%) 163 37 (22.7%) 165 25 (15.2%) Absolute difference 7.5 RR 1.3 (95% CI 0.7 to 2.3)
Thomson 2007 (in consultation) GP consultations postintervention 51 39 (76.5%) 54 32 (59.3%) P = 0.35
Hospital appointments postintervention 51 29 (56.9%) 54 10 (18.5%) P = 0.06
Wait time from screening of eligibility to decision
Stacey 2014a Wait time in weeks 69 33.4 weeks 71 33 weeks No difference

CI: confidence interval; DA: decision aid; RR: risk ratio; SD: standard deviation.