Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 12;2017(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5

Comparison 2. Accurate risk perceptions.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Accurate risk perceptions ‐ all studies 17 5096 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.10 [1.66, 2.66]
2 Accurate risk perceptions ‐ subgroup by timing of intervention (in consultation versus in preparation for consultation) 17   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 In consultation 6 898 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.79 [1.28, 2.52]
2.2 In preparation for consultation 11 4198 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.25 [1.65, 3.07]
3 Accurate risk perceptions ‐ studies without high risk of bias 15 4732 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.02 [1.57, 2.59]