Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD004879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub4
Methods Cohort study carried out on people from the Chinese Peoples’ Liberation Army (PLA) between December 1996 and May 1997
Participants "One hundred and sixty‐eight children aged 3 to 6 years from the PLA in areas not considered at risk and who had not had influenza recently (adult and elderly data not extracted). Vaccinated groups consisted of 80 children aged between 3 and 6 years, 363 adults between 18 and 59 and 235 elderly over 60 years Controls were not immunised. Correspondent groups consisted respectively of 88 (children), 372 (adults) and 218 (elderly) people"
Interventions Inactivated influenza vaccine "Vaxigrip" (Pasteur Mérieux Connaught, France). Children up to 3 years were immunised with 2 doses of 0.25 ml administered 1 month apart. A single dose of 0.5 ml was administered to children over 3 years and adults
Outcomes Serological N/A
Effectiveness
"All participants were observed from 21 days to 6 months after vaccination. They were asked to report the following symptoms: fever over 38.5°C, headache, myalgia or arthralgia, cough, sore throat and coryza. Cases of fever for other causes were excluded
  • Influenza‐like syndrome: presence of fever over 38.5°C and headache, myalgia or arthralgia

  • Common cold: associated with 1 of the following: fever, headache, myalgia or arthralgia, cough, rhinorrhoea, sore throat

  • Upper respiratory tract symptoms: influenza‐like syndrome + common cold"


Safety Not assessed. Only serious adverse reactions that occurred during the study are reported
Funding Source Government
Notes "The examined vaccine was strongly protective in populations of different ages
  • The difference between outcomes is unclear. Gender was not considered in the reporting and it appears strange that children are enrolled in the PLA


  • May have lost a lot in translation. Very confusing outcome definition and overlap. We have a problem believing that the vaccine protected from the common cold. Viral circulation was not discussed"

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
PCS/RCS‐Selection Exposed cohort Unclear risk Insufficient description
PCS/RCS‐Selection Non Exposed cohort Unclear risk Insufficient description
PCS/RCS‐Comparability Unclear risk Insufficient description
PCS/RCS‐Assessment of Oucome High risk Self‐reported
Summary assessments High risk Plausible bias that seriously weakens confidence in the results