Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD004879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub4
Methods Randomised, blind, placebo‐controlled trial to assess reactogenicity in children of live attenuated cold‐adapted influenza B vaccine
Participants "The study was conducted in a children's nursery and in a children's boarding school. 109 children and 87 children 3 to 15 years old received respectively vaccine or placebo"
Interventions Enrolled participants were randomised to receive at least 1 dose or 2 doses of live attenuated cold‐adapted influenza B vaccine derived by re‐assortment between wild‐type B/Ann Arbor/1/86 and ca B/Leningrad/14/55 viruses. First dose vaccine or placebo was administered at day 0 and second dose after 3 weeks. 0.5 ml vaccine or placebo were administered intranasally by aerosol spray. Placebo consisted of distilled water At the time of the study no evidence of circulation of influenza B viruses in Moscow was reported to the laboratory responsible for surveillance in the region
Outcomes Serological HI titre against LEN‐B/14/5/1 reassortant virus. Sera were collected by finger stick before the first and second inoculations and three weeks later. Estimation
Effectiveness N/A
Safety Adverse reactions were defined as fever (axillary temperature >37.5°C) and upper respiratory symptoms (coryza and/or pharyngitis) observed for four days after each inoculation
Funding Source Government
Notes
  • The authors conclude that the vaccine was immunogenic in younger children but less so in older children

  • There was lot of unexplained attrition between the first and second inoculations

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No description
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not used
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Single‐blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk There was lot of unexplained attrition between the first and second inoculations
Summary assessments High risk There was lot of unexplained attrition between the first and second inoculations