| Methods | Randomised, blind, placebo‐controlled trial to assess reactogenicity in children of live attenuated cold‐adapted influenza B vaccine | |
| Participants | "The study was conducted in a children's nursery and in a children's boarding school. 109 children and 87 children 3 to 15 years old received respectively vaccine or placebo" | |
| Interventions | Enrolled participants were randomised to receive at least 1 dose or 2 doses of live attenuated cold‐adapted influenza B vaccine derived by re‐assortment between wild‐type B/Ann Arbor/1/86 and ca B/Leningrad/14/55 viruses. First dose vaccine or placebo was administered at day 0 and second dose after 3 weeks. 0.5 ml vaccine or placebo were administered intranasally by aerosol spray. Placebo consisted of distilled water At the time of the study no evidence of circulation of influenza B viruses in Moscow was reported to the laboratory responsible for surveillance in the region | |
| Outcomes |
Serological HI titre against LEN‐B/14/5/1 reassortant virus. Sera were collected by finger stick before the first and second inoculations and three weeks later. Estimation Effectiveness N/A Safety Adverse reactions were defined as fever (axillary temperature >37.5°C) and upper respiratory symptoms (coryza and/or pharyngitis) observed for four days after each inoculation |
|
| Funding Source | Government | |
| Notes |
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No description |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not used |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Single‐blinding |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | There was lot of unexplained attrition between the first and second inoculations |
| Summary assessments | High risk | There was lot of unexplained attrition between the first and second inoculations |