Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD004879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub4
Methods
  • RCT of live vaccines

  • Influenza virus B ‐ B/14/5/1 produced by recombination of 2 surface antigens (HA and NA) from epidemic strain B/Ann Arbor/2/86 and 6 "core" antigens from attenuated donor strain B/Leningrad/14/17. Activity of B/14/5/1 7.0 IU of EIE50 in 0.2 ml. (EIE = Experimental Immunogenic Effect in 50% experimental participants)

  • Commercially available influenza vaccine A (H1N1) A/Taiwan/1/87 also used, with biological activity of 7.0 IU of EIE50/0.2 ml

  • Children randomised into 4 groups with 1 child serving as a sample unit

  • All treatments were administered in 2 x 0.5 ml doses by intranasal spray using Smirnov apparatus. 21 interval between first and second doses

  • Children followed up for 5 days after each dose

  • Immunogenicity of vaccine determined using reaction of haemagglutinin deceleration and ELISA developed for influenza B virus

Participants 1009 children age 3 to 14 years
Interventions Influenza virus B ‐ B/14/5/1 (recombinant) Commercial influenza A vaccine ‐ A/Taiwan/1/87 (H1N1)
Outcomes
  • Mild fever (31.7 to 37.5°C), moderate fever, malaise, headache, rhinorrhoea, nasal stuffiness, cough, hoarse voice, sore throat, nasal bleeding, conjunctivitis

  • Seroconversion (data not extracted)

  • Mean antibody titres (data not extracted)

  • Increase in ELISA titre (data not extracted)

Funding Source Unclear
Notes The text refers to 4 randomised arms with a total denominator of 1009 (this is not a mistranslation as we have checked the original in Arab numerals). Table 2 reports data on 321 children. No mention of the missing children is made. We believe the data is uninterpretable
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No description
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Not used
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk No description
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk No mention of the missing children is made
Summary assessments High risk Data are uninterpretable