Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD004879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub4
Methods 2001 to 2002 season data from Vesikari 2006
Participants
Interventions
Outcomes
Funding Source Industry
Notes This second Year could be biased due to attrition
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient descriptions
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient descriptions
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient descriptions
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk The proportion of missing outcomes compared with observed event risk enough to induce clinically relevant bias in intervention effect estimate
Summary assessments High risk Some doubts arise from attrition bias