Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD004879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub4
Methods A prospective, population‐based case‐control study of hospitalisations attributable to laboratory‐confirmed influenza was performed in counties that encompass Nashville, Tennessee, Rochester, New York and Cincinnati, Ohio, during the 2003–2004 and 2004–2005 influenza seasons. Each site conducted surveillance at sufficient hospitals to capture 95% of hospitalisations attributable to acute respiratory illness (ARI) or fever among children residing in the respective county. Study nurses enrolled children within 48 hours after admission to surveillance hospitals Sunday through Thursday in the 2003–2004 influenza season and 7 days per week during the 2004–2005 season
Participants Description of cases: Eligible children were county residents, 5 years of age or younger, with an admission diagnosis of ARI or fever with laboratory‐confirmed influenza Description of controls: Children resident in the same county of cases who tested negative for influenza were control participants
Interventions Unclear. Matching is described as suboptimal
Outcomes
Funding Source Government
Notes The authors conclude that “even in an influenza season (2004–2005) with a suboptimal vaccine match, more than 1 half of these visits could be prevented with recommended influenza vaccination
Partial vaccination did not seem to be effective
These results offer additional evidence in support of recommendations for vaccinating children against influenza and they highlight the importance of children receiving the recommended number of influenza vaccinations”
  • No mention of blind exposure assessment is made and effects of vaccine on laboratory outcomes supposedly assesses effectiveness

  • No broken down data are provided

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
CC‐Case Selection Low risk Independent validation
CC‐Control Selection Low risk Same population
CC‐Comparability Low risk Possibly adequate
CC‐Exposure Low risk Secure record
Summary assessments Low risk Plausible bias unlikely to seriously alter the results