Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 9;2017(4):CD004022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004022.pub4

Comparison 9. Bias analyses.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 White population, normotensive, SBP blinding‐high 66 7100 Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.91 [‐1.19, ‐0.63]
2 White population, normotensive, SBP blinding‐low 24 1193 Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.05 [‐1.61, ‐0.50]
3 White population, normotensive, SBP outcome‐assesed‐high 36 2771 Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.12 [‐1.60, ‐0.65]
4 White population, normotensive, SBP outcome‐assesed‐low 56 5768 Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.89 [‐1.18, ‐0.60]
5 White population, hypertensive, SBP blinding‐high 45 3814 Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) ‐6.03 [‐6.64, ‐5.41]
6 White population, hypertensive, SBP blinding‐low 36 1911 Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) ‐5.78 [‐6.39, ‐5.17]
7 White population, hypertensive, SBP outcome‐assesed‐high 27 2470 Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) ‐6.07 [‐6.95, ‐5.19]
8 White population, hypertensive, SBP outcome‐assesed‐low 55 3433 Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) ‐5.71 [‐6.23, ‐5.19]