Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 9;2017(4):CD004022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004022.pub4

1128 Schorr 1996.

Methods DB 
 CO
Participants N16
 Norm
 Age 64
Interventions SR 74 (175.2‐104.8)
 Dur28
Outcomes SBP 
 DBP 
 Aldo 
 Renin 
 Chol 
 HDL 
 LDL 
 TG
Notes Included 21
 LoFo: 5
 IT: 0
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double blind study
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Lost to follow up 5/21
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No distinct selective outcome reporting
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double blind study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double blind study