Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 9;2017(4):CD004022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004022.pub4

1161 DASH 2001 WH.

Methods DB
 CO
Participants N37
 Hyp
 Non‐black
 Age 48
Interventions SR 55
 Dur 30
Outcomes SBP 
 DBP not mentioned, see DASH 2b
Notes LoFo: 5%
 IT: No
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open study
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Lost to follow up 5%
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No distinct selective outcome reporting
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by participants and personnel during the study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The personnel involved in the collection of the outcome data were unaware of participants diet assignment