Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 9;2017(4):CD004022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004022.pub4

1175 Kerstens 2003.

Methods Op
 CO
Participants N 28 (M/F:21/7)(B/W/A.0/28/0)
 Norm
 Age 24
Interventions SR 202 (248‐42)
 Dur 7
Outcomes MAP
 Ren, Aldo
Notes LoFo: 0
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open study
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Lost to follow‐up 0
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No distinct selective outcome reporting
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open study: Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by participants and personnel during the study.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open study: Detection bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by outcome assessors