1208 Todd 2012.

Methods	SB, Co
Participants	N 23 (M/F:5/18)(B/W/A.0/23/0) Normotension Age 43.7
Interventions	SR 140 Dur 28
Outcomes	SBP, DBP
Notes	28 screened, 25 included, 23 randomized. LoFo. 4
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Low risk	Randomization was carried out by a third party using http:// www.randomization.com to generate the randomization sequence for the tomato juice interventions.
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Low risk	The sequence was given to the Dunedin hospital pharmacy, where a study dedicated pharmacist added the allocated amount of salt to the tomato juice.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes	Low risk	Single blind study
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Low risk	Lost to follow up 4/23
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Unclear risk	No distinct selective reporting
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	Low risk	The investigators remained blind to the randomization sequence throughout the study. Participants were initially blind to the randomization sequence, but once they began each phase of the intervention they were aware of the presence or absence of added salt. They were asked not to tell the investigator which tomato juice they had received.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	Low risk	Outcome detection blinded