Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 28;2016(4):CD001769. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001769.pub3
Methods Parallel study design, outpatient setting
Study conducted at two centres in the UK
Random list generated using random permuted blocks
Allocation concealed using sealed opaque envelopes
Unblinded
Participants Adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy (2 or more untreated partial or generalised tonic‐clonic seizures in the 12 months preceding the trial)
Number randomised: PHT = 63; SV = 61
53 participants (43%) with partial epilepsy. 62 (48%) men
Mean age (range): 33 (14‐72) years
Range of follow‐up (months): 1‐91
Interventions Monotherapy with PHT or SV
Median daily dose achieved: PHT: 300 mg/day, SV: 800 mg/day
Outcomes Time to first seizure recurrence after start of therapy Time to 12‐month remission from all seizures Adverse events and withdrawal due to adverse events
Notes IPD provided for all outcomes of this review
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation list generated using permuted blocks of size 8 or 16 with stratification for centre, seizure type and presence of neurological signs
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Allocation concealed via 4 batches of concealed opaque envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk Unblinded, authors state masking of treatment would not be “practical” and would have “introduced bias due to a very large drop‐out rate”
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes High risk Unblinded, authors state masking of treatment would not be “practical” and would have “introduced bias due to a very large drop‐out rate”
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Attrition rates reported, all randomised participants analyses from IPD provided (see footnote 2)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported or calculated with IPD provided (see footnote 2)
Other bias Low risk No other bias detected