Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 21;2017(4):CD000398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000398.pub2

ENOS 2015.

Methods Single‐blind, parallel‐group, partial factorial study
Randomisation via password‐protected, data‐encrypted website (minimisation by age, sex, stroke severity, time to treatment and total anterior circulation syndrome)
Participants International (23 countries), multicentre (173 sites)
4011 participants: treatment 2000; control 2011
Age: treatment 70 years; control 70 years
Male: treatment 1147 (57%); control 1150 (57%)
Inclusion: IS or ICH; motor deficit in arm or leg, or both; systolic BP 140 to 220 mmHg
Time to randomisation: within 48 hours of onset
Interventions
  • Treatment: transdermal GTN patch 5 mg once daily

  • Control: no GTN (blinding with gauze dressing over patch/equivalent area of skin)


In appropriate participants:
  • Treatment: continue pre‐stroke antihypertensive medication

  • Control: stop pre‐stroke antihypertensive medication


Duration: 7 days
Outcomes Primary: mRS at day 90
Secondary:
  • days 1 to 7: BP and HR

  • day 7: recurrent stroke

  • discharge: length of hospital stay; disposition

  • day 90: death or dependency (mRS > 2); BI; EQ‐5D, EQ‐VAS; MMSE, TICS‐M; animal naming; Zung Depression Scale

Notes Exclusions: GCS < 8; pure sensory stroke; preceding dependency (mRS 3 to 5); confounding neurological or psychiatric illness; stroke mimic; severe liver or renal dysfunction; severe comorbidity; pregnant or breastfeeding; planned surgical intervention; previous participation in ENOS 2015; contraindication to or definite need for nitrates and/or prestroke antihypertensive medication
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Central computer randomisation with minimisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Central website‐based
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk GTN was given single‐blinded (participant), whilst outcomes were assessed centrally and blinded to treatment group
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk GTN was given single‐blinded as no placebo patches were available. A gauze dressing was placed over the GTN patch or equivalent area of skin out of sight. As a result, participants were blinded whilst the treating clinician was unblinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcomes assessed centrally, blinded to treatment group
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No difference between trial groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk None found