ENOS 2015.
Methods | Single‐blind, parallel‐group, partial factorial study Randomisation via password‐protected, data‐encrypted website (minimisation by age, sex, stroke severity, time to treatment and total anterior circulation syndrome) |
|
Participants | International (23 countries), multicentre (173 sites) 4011 participants: treatment 2000; control 2011 Age: treatment 70 years; control 70 years Male: treatment 1147 (57%); control 1150 (57%) Inclusion: IS or ICH; motor deficit in arm or leg, or both; systolic BP 140 to 220 mmHg Time to randomisation: within 48 hours of onset |
|
Interventions |
In appropriate participants:
Duration: 7 days |
|
Outcomes | Primary: mRS at day 90 Secondary:
|
|
Notes | Exclusions: GCS < 8; pure sensory stroke; preceding dependency (mRS 3 to 5); confounding neurological or psychiatric illness; stroke mimic; severe liver or renal dysfunction; severe comorbidity; pregnant or breastfeeding; planned surgical intervention; previous participation in ENOS 2015; contraindication to or definite need for nitrates and/or prestroke antihypertensive medication | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Central computer randomisation with minimisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Central website‐based |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | GTN was given single‐blinded (participant), whilst outcomes were assessed centrally and blinded to treatment group |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | GTN was given single‐blinded as no placebo patches were available. A gauze dressing was placed over the GTN patch or equivalent area of skin out of sight. As a result, participants were blinded whilst the treating clinician was unblinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcomes assessed centrally, blinded to treatment group |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No difference between trial groups |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All prespecified outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | None found |