Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 28;2017(4):CD011748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011748.pub2
Methods Type of RCT: 1:2 parallel‐group, double‐blind, stratified RCT
Settings: outpatient care
Duration: 52 weeks
Start and stop dates: 07/2012 and 04/2014
Participants Number of participants: 316
Number lost to follow‐up: 30
Women: 108 (34%)
Age (SD), years: 63 (9)
History of CVD: 247 (78%)
FH participants: 0
Participants with hypercholesterolaemia (LDL‐C ≥ 70 mg/dL) and established CVD or LDL‐C of 100 mg/dL and CHD risk equivalents (e.g. chronic kidney disease) and on a maximally tolerated dose of statin, with possible addition of other lipid‐lowering therapies
Interventions Background therapy: both add‐on to maximal tolerated dose of statin
Randomised therapy: alirocumab vs placebo
Alirocumab dose: 104 weeks of 75 mg alirocumab every 2 weeks, with uptitration of alirocumab to 150 mg every 2 weeks at week 12. resulting in a 2‐week equivalent dose of 75 mg to 150 mg
Outcomes CVD, lipids, any adverse events, all‐cause mortality
Notes
  • LDL‐C was calculated using the Friedewald formula, or if triglycerides exceeded 400 mg/dL, via the beta quantification method

  • NCT01644175

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Does not mention randomisation but presumably similar as COMBO II: using an interactive voice‐response system
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Does not describe this
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) LDL‐C Low risk Both were blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) LDL‐C Low risk Central laboratory
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk 20 (9.57%) participants in the alirocumab arm had missing lipid measurements compared with 10 (9.34%) in the comparator arm. Potenially, these "missing" participants simply did not make the required follow‐up time (24 weeks) owing to late enrolment; however, without specific description of the reasons for these lower numbers, some concern is warranted
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Reports on protocol‐defined endpoints
Other bias High risk Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron