Table 1. Growth parameters of the last (5th) larval instar (mean values±SE) of Ematurga atomaria, a lepidopteran with sexual dimorphism in pupal masses.
Variable | Female | Male | F1;1243 | P | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time to last instar (days) | 18.17±0.070 | 17.58±0.065 | 36.95 | <0.0001 | 0.071 |
Initial mass (mg) | 29.18±0.15 | 25.30±0.11 | 475.65 | <0.0001 | 0.25 |
Maximal mass (mg) | 120.24±0.52 | 98.91±0.36 | 1503.01 | <0.0001 | 0.37 |
Pupal mass (mg) | 73.57±0.37 | 63.28±0.24 | 770.10 | <0.0001 | 0.32 |
Development time (days) | 11.46±0.066 | 10.10±0.059 | 335.23 | <0.0001 | 0.18 |
Pupal mass/initial mass | 2.55±0.014 | 2.52±0.011 | 3.35 | 0.068 | 0.15 |
Maximal mass/ initial mass | 4.16±0.021 | 3.94±0.015 | 94.69 | <0.0001 | 0.14 |
Maximal mass/ final mass | 1.39±0.0038 | 1.37± 0.0032 | 38.10 | <0.00011 | 0.051 |
Time to maximal mass (days) | 9.75±0.058 | 8.67±0.052 | 247.77 | <0.0001 | 0.18 |
Absolute mass increment, 2nd day (mg) | 9.89±0.17 | 8.76±0.14 | 24.46 | <0.0001 | 0.002 |
Absolute mass increment, 3rd day (mg) | 11.84±0.19 | 10.43±0.17 | 33.06 | <0.0001 | 0.007 |
Absolute mass increment,4th day (mg) | 12.58±0.22 | 11.37±0.19 | 17.99 | <0.0001 | 0.0056 |
Absolute mass increment, 5th day (mg) | 12.03±0.23 | 10.68±0.21 | 21.83 | <0.0001 | 0.0034 |
Absolute mass increment, 6th day (mg) | 12.61±0.25 | 10.92±0.22 | 0.98 | 0.322 | 0.0081 |
Absolute mass increment, 7th day (mg) | 11.19±0.26 | 9.05±0.25 | 8.40 | 0.003 | 0.0037 |
Absolute mass increment, 8th day (mg) | 8.68±0.26 | 5.14±0.28 | 17.28 | <0.0001 | 0.013 |
Absolute mass increment, 9th day (mg) | 4.13±0.33 | -1.65±0.38 | 135.96 | <0.0001 | 0.045 |
Presenting daily absolute mass increments illustrates how growth slows down when the larva approaches pupation, this happens earlier in males than in females. Sexes are compared using mixed analysis of variance with food plant as an additional fixed factor and brood (offspring of an individual female) as a random factor, type III sum of squares. Effect size of sex is visualised by presenting factor-specific R2 values. Analysing the data separately by host plants did not lead to qualitatively different results.