Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 20;2017(4):CD011516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2

1. Labour diagnosis algorithm versus routine care (Cheyne 2008).

OUTCOME Intervention (after )
n = 892
Control (after)
n = 1279
Difference between groups adjusted for baseline differences between clusters with 95% CI P value
Spontaneous vertex delivery 526 785 ‐3.2 (‐15.1 to 8.7) 0.6
ARM 401 500 5.6 (‐2.2 to 13.4) 0.1
Electronic fetal monitoring 557 820 ‐0.1 (‐14.2 to 14.1) 1.0
Assisted vaginal delivery 241 323    
Caesarean section 123 168    
3rd or 4th degree tear 7 8    
Epidural 290 441 2.1 (‐8.0 to 12.2) 0.7
Additional analgesia required
Opiate
532 649 1.5 (‐4.6 to 7.6) 0.6
Additional analgesia required
Epidural and opiate
177 225 4.4 (‐2.8 to 11.7) 0.2
Any maternal complication 439 596 3.9 (‐9.4 to 17.2) 0.5
PP haemorrhage (specify)
Intrapartum
Post partum
5
10
7
20
   
Labour augmentation with oxytocin 343 484 0.3 (‐9.2 to 9.8) 0.9
Unplanned birth out of hospital 11 11    
Fetal distress 166 242 2.4 (‐6.6 to 11.3) 0.6
Meconium stained liquor 133 211 ‐0.5 (‐7.2 to 6.3) 0.9
Neonatal resuscitation 106 145 ‐0.9 (‐6.4 to 4.7) 0.7
Admission to special care 29 60 ‐0.4 (‐2.6 to 1.8) 0.7
Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes 9 13    
Admission to hospital at first presentation (1 admission)
One presentations before admission in labour
Two presentations before admission in labour
Three or more presentations before admission in labour
398
305
149
35
795
366
88
20
‐19.2 (‐29.9 to ‐8.6) 0.002
Failure to progress 1st stage
Failure to progress 2nd stage
42
142
59
119
‐3.4 (‐15.3 to 8.6)
15.2 (‐4.5 to 34.9)
0.5
0.1