Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 20;2017(4):CD011516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2

Comparison 1. Assessment vs direct admission in early labour.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Length of labour (hours) 1 209 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐5.20 [‐7.06, ‐3.34]
2 Rate of caesarean section 1 209 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.30, 1.72]
3 Rate of instrumental vaginal birth 1 209 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.58, 1.26]
4 Baby born before arrival at hospital or unplanned home birth 1 209 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Augmentation of labour 1 209 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.57 [0.37, 0.86]
6 Use of epidural or any regional anaesthesia 1 209 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.78, 0.98]
7 Maternal satisfaction (score) 1 201 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 16.0 [7.53, 24.47]
8 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes 1 209 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.97 [0.12, 72.12]