Smith 1993.
| Methods | Randomised, double‐blind, cross‐over study. Two treatment arms: 1 placebo, 1 lamotrigine. Pre‐randomisation baseline = 4 weeks. Treatment I and II = 18 weeks each. Washout = 6 weeks. |
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | Add‐on lamotrigine or placebo. Lamotrigine dose up to 400 mg/day. Median daily dose was 300 mg. Participants on valproate received lower doses. | |
| Outcomes | (1) 50% responder rates. (2) Withdrawal from study for any reason. (3) Adverse effects. (4) Health‐related quality of life (HRQL). | |
| Notes | HRQL model was completed by 40 to 54 of 81 participants. | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer generated random permuted blocks. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Partecipants were allocated sequentially numbered, sealed packages containing either lamotrigine or placebo. |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Patients (46/73) and investigators (52/73) were able to identify lamotrigine treatment. Identical tablets and packaging were used. Prepacked coded medication dispensed by pharmacy. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | Unclear risk | No participants were excluded from analysis. 9 people withdrew from the study; 6 receiving lamotrigine and 3 receiving placebo. The reasons for exclusion were reported. Patients who discontinued prematurely did not complete the HRQOL measure at the time of discontinuation, the exclusion of treatment failures may introduce a bias in favour of lamotrigine. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Protocol unavailable, but appears all expected and pre‐specified outcomes were reported. |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | This study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline, the manufactures of LTG. |
AED: antiepileptic drug
LTG: lamotrigine