Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 23;2019(4):CD004317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004317.pub5

Comparison 1. Intensive counseling versus usual family planning care.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Continuation of hormonal contraceptive method 6 2624 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.28 [1.07, 1.54]
1.1 Multiple counseling contacts 4 1790 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.34 [1.09, 1.66]
1.2 One‐off multi‐component counseling 3 834 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.11 [0.76, 1.60]
2 Rate of discontinuation of contraceptive method due to adverse events 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Discontinuation rate due to menstrual disturbances 1 350 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.20 [0.11, 0.37]
2.2 Discontinuation rate due to all other adverse events 1 350 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.73 [0.36, 1.47]
3 Pregnancy 3 1985 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.24 [0.98, 1.57]