Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2019 Mar 4;95(5):1253–1261. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.12.023

Table 2.

Predicted GFR values, slopes and paired differences between predicted and observed GFR at different ages using polynomial model

Age (yr) 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60
Class A GFR 109 (95-123) 110 (99-121) 97 (83-110) 69 (49-90)
Slope 0.77 −0.63 −2.03 −3.42
Diff (SE) −2.19 (5.56) −2.27 (11.00) −4.84 (5.26) 12.19 (2.33)
Class B GFR 113 (106-120) 108 (103-113) 89 (82-96) 56 (45-67)
Slope 0.21 −1.19 −2.58 −3.98
Diff (SE) 6.51 (5.96) 5.77 (3.55) 5.83 (3.88) −0.06 (7.24)
Class C GFR 113 (107-119) 101 (96-106) 75 (68-82) 35 (24-45)
Slope −0.52 −1.92 −3.32 −4.71
Diff (SE) 2.39 (5.38) 9.27 (3.98) 8.84 (3.77) 6.42 (5.19)
Class D GFR 119 (112-125) 92 (87-98) 51 (44-59) −3.23 (−15.73-9.26)
Slope −1.97 −3.37 −4.77 −6.16
Diff (SE) 4.40 (5.71) 7.00 (4.25) 6.34 (5.26) 21.13 (5.59)
Class E GFR 103 (97-110) 64 (57-71) 10 (0-21) 0
Slope −3.25 −4.65 −6.05
Diff (SE) −0.93 (4.94) 1.99 (5.65) 20.27 (6.92)

Units of GFR are mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI); slopes are mL/min/1.73 m2 per year

Diff (SE) are calculated based on the midpoint of age intervals.

Diff = observed GFR - predicted GFR; positive means underestimated