Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 30;51(2):493–506. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1048-1

Table 6.

Summary of intercorrelations between (chance-corrected) recognition scores and valence, arousal, and intensity ratings in (a) the UK and (b) Sweden

a) UK Recognition Intensity Valence Arousal
Recognition .287*** .033 .289***
Intensity – .001 .836***
Valence .071
Arousal
b) SWEDEN Recognition Intensity Valence Arousal
Recognition .36*** – .10** .35***
Intensity .22*** .79***
Valence .14***
Arousal

The tables indicate Pearson’s correlation coefficients and p values for significant relationships between the variables: *p < .05, **p < .05, ***p < .001