. 2019 Apr 23;9:6435. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42843-1

Table 1.

Richness and diversity parameters of gut microbiome from C. maculatus as affected by DDVP and EO.

Generations	F₁			F₅
Parameters	Control	DDVP	EO	Control	DDVP	EO
Coverage (%)	77.08 ± 2.9^b	71.96 ± 1.56^b^c	87.38 ± 2.19^a	68.4 ± 1.32^c	72.08 ± 2.24^bc	89.42 ± 1.54^a
OTUs¹	74 ± 4^a	77 ± 5^a	54 ± 6^b	76 ± 4^a	84 ± 5^a	22 ± 3^c
Chao1	7.39 ± 1^ab	7.47 ± 0.04^a	5.93 ± 0.15^c	6.87 ± 0.18^b	7.18 ± 0.1^ab	4.47 ± 0.3^d
Shannon²	4.78 ± 0.13^a	4.98 ± 0.1^a	3.58 ± 0.3^b	4.61 ± 0.14^a	4.56 ± 0.15^a	2.47 ± 0.11^c
Simpson²	0.92 ± 0.02^a	0.94 ± 0.01^a	0.67 ± 0.03^c	0.82 ± 0.03^b	0.76 ± 0.04^d	0.57 ± 0.03^d
IL (kb)³	1.3–1.5	1.3–1.5	1.3–1.5	1.3–1.5	1.3–1.5	1.3–1.5
Cutoffs	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001	0.0001

Different letters (^{a, b, c, d}) within rows are statistically different after parametric New Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at P = 0.05. ¹The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were defined with 3% dissimilarity level; ²The richness estimator (Chao1) and diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) were calculated according to Good’s method⁷² and the mothur program, respectively; ³Isoform length (kb). Each datum represents the Mean ± SE of 3 replicates.