Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 23;10:1906. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09930-3

Table 1.

Subjects characteristics included in the study

Total NP PNR PR P-value
Total subjects 27 10 10 7
Age donor Mean [min–max] 30 [15–47] 26 [15–47] 33 [17–44] 31 [20–42] 0.2
Age recipient Mean [min–max] 12 [1–19] 13 [8–19] 10 [3–19] 11 [1–17] 0.3
Gender donor Male/female 14/13 7/3 5/5 2/5 0.2
Gender recipient Male/female 16/11 5/5 6/4 5/2 0.7
Donor source Cadaver 13 6 4 3
Living/related 14 4 6 4 0.6
Race recipient Caucasian 12 2 6 4
AA 6 4 1 1 0.2
Asian 1 0 0 1
Other 8 4 3 1
Immunosuppression Steroid-based 13 6 4 3
Steroid-free 14 4 6 4 0.6
HLA mismatch Mean [min–max] 4 [1–6] 4 [3–6] 4 [1–6] 4 [2–6] 0.8
Cause of ESRD Non-immune structural mediated 4 2 2 0 0.6
Other/unknown 13 5 5 3
Reflux 10 3 3 4
Rejection time (months) Mean [min–max] 12.5 [6.0, 24.0]
DSA 2 0 1 1 -

There were no significant differences for any of the donor and recipient characteristics by clinical outcome, including HLA mismatch and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) that was classified in three main groups: Non-immune structural mediated (polycystic kidney disease and aplastic/hypoplastic/dysplastic kidneys), Reflux (obstructive uropathy, pyelonephritis/interstitial nephritis and reflux nephropathy) and other/unknown (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, cystinosis, hemolytic uremic syndrome, cortical necrosis, other and unknown). Class I DSA was developed in one individual in the PNR and also was found at time 0 in another individual in the PR group