Table 4.
Confusion matrix for ripeness grading identification for different classifiers.
Fruit | Classifier | TP % | FP % | FN % | TN % | Accu. % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Golden Apple | Naive Bayes | 73.66 | 6.67 | 26.33 | 93.33 | 83.50 |
Linear Discriminant Analysis | 73.00 | 8.67 | 27.00 | 91.33 | 82.17 | |
Decision Tree | 76.33 | 12.33 | 23.67 | 87.67 | 82.00 | |
Nearest Neighbor | 81.33 | 13.33 | 18.67 | 86.67 | 84.00 | |
Nearest Neighbor k = 5 | 80.00 | 13.67 | 20.00 | 86.33 | 83.17 | |
SVM | 68.00 | 2.00 | 32.00 | 98.00 | 83.00 | |
Banana | Naive Bayes | 90.00 | 4.00 | 10.00 | 96.00 | 93.00 |
Linear Discriminant Analysis | 90.50 | 5.00 | 9.50 | 95.00 | 92.75 | |
Decision Tree | 84.50 | 3.50 | 15.50 | 96.50 | 90.50 | |
Nearest Neighbor | 87.00 | 13.00 | 13.00 | 87.00 | 87.00 | |
Nearest Neighbor k = 5 | 87.00 | 3.00 | 13.00 | 97.00 | 92.00 | |
SVM | 90.50 | 5.50 | 9.50 | 94.50 | 92.50 | |
Red apple | Naive Bayes | 73.33 | 46.67 | 26.67 | 53.33 | 63.33 |
Linear Discriminant Analysis | 86.67 | 40.00 | 13.33 | 60.00 | 73.33 | |
Decision Tree | 63.33 | 40.00 | 36.37 | 60.00 | 61.67 | |
Nearest Neighbor | 60.00 | 66.67 | 40.00 | 33.33 | 46.67 | |
Nearest Neighbor k = 5 | 80.00 | 36.67 | 20.00 | 63.33 | 71.67 | |
SVM | 96.67 | 90.00 | 3.3 | 10.00 | 53.33 | |
QDA | 86.67 | 26.67 | 13.33 | 73.33 | 80.00 |