Table 4.

The effects of yield and purity of phenolic compounds on ${\mathit{SAB}}_{\mathit{purity}}^F$ and ${\mathit{SAB}}_{\mathit{yield}}^F.$

Run	Habitat	Phenolic Compounds Yield of Water Extract							Phenolic Compounds Purity of Water Extract							Final Product Indices
		$\mathit{D}\mathit{S}{\mathit{S}}_{\mathit{y}\mathit{i}\mathit{e}\mathit{l}\mathit{d}}^{\mathit{E}} (\mathbf{mg}/\mathbf{g} \mathbf{medicinal} \mathbf{slices})$	$\mathit{P}{\mathit{A}}_{\mathit{y}\mathit{i}\mathit{e}\mathit{l}\mathit{d}}^{\mathit{E}} (\times {10}^{-2}\mathbf{mg}/\mathbf{g} \mathbf{medicinal} \mathbf{slices})$	$\mathit{C}{\mathit{A}}_{\mathit{y}\mathit{i}\mathit{e}\mathit{l}\mathit{d}}^{\mathit{E}} (\times {10}^{-2}\mathbf{mg}/\mathbf{g} \mathbf{medicinal} \mathbf{slices})$	$\mathit{R}{\mathit{A}}_{\mathit{y}\mathit{i}\mathit{e}\mathit{l}\mathit{d}}^{\mathit{E}} (\mathbf{mg}/\mathbf{g} \mathbf{medicinal} \mathbf{slices})$	$\mathit{L}{\mathit{A}}_{\mathit{y}\mathit{i}\mathit{e}\mathit{l}\mathit{d}}^{\mathit{E}} (\mathbf{mg}/\mathbf{g} \mathbf{medicinal} \mathbf{slices})$	$\mathit{S}\mathit{A}{\mathit{B}}_{\mathit{y}\mathit{i}\mathit{e}\mathit{l}\mathit{d}}^{\mathit{E}} (\mathbf{mg}/\mathbf{g} \mathbf{medicinal} \mathbf{slices})$	$\mathit{S}\mathit{A}{\mathit{A}}_{\mathit{y}\mathit{i}\mathit{e}\mathit{l}\mathit{d}}^{\mathit{E}} (\mathbf{mg}/\mathbf{g} \mathbf{medicinal} \mathbf{slices})$	$\mathit{D}\mathit{S}{\mathit{S}}_{\mathit{p}\mathit{u}\mathit{r}\mathit{i}\mathit{t}\mathit{y}}^{\mathit{E}} (\times {10}^{-2}, \%)$	$\mathit{P}{\mathit{A}}_{\mathit{p}\mathit{u}\mathit{r}\mathit{i}\mathit{t}\mathit{y}}^{\mathit{E}} (\times {10}^{-2}, \%)$	$\mathit{C}{\mathit{A}}_{\mathit{p}\mathit{u}\mathit{r}\mathit{i}\mathit{t}\mathit{y}}^{\mathit{E}}(\times {10}^{-2}, \%)$	$\mathit{R}{\mathit{A}}_{\mathit{p}\mathit{u}\mathit{r}\mathit{i}\mathit{t}\mathit{y}}^{\mathit{E}} (\%)$	$\mathit{L}{\mathit{A}}_{\mathit{p}\mathit{u}\mathit{r}\mathit{i}\mathit{t}\mathit{y}}^{\mathit{E}} (\%)$	$\mathit{S}\mathit{A}{\mathit{B}}_{\mathit{p}\mathit{u}\mathit{r}\mathit{i}\mathit{t}\mathit{y}}^{\mathit{E}} (\%)$	$\mathit{S}\mathit{A}{\mathit{A}}_{\mathit{p}\mathit{u}\mathit{r}\mathit{i}\mathit{t}\mathit{y}}^{\mathit{E}} (\%)$	$\mathit{S}\mathit{A}{\mathit{B}}_{\mathit{p}\mathit{u}\mathit{r}\mathit{i}\mathit{t}\mathit{y}}^{\mathit{F}} (\%)$	$\mathit{S}\mathit{A}{\mathit{B}}_{\mathit{y}\mathit{i}\mathit{e}\mathit{l}\mathit{d}}^{\mathit{F}} (\mathbf{mg}/\mathbf{g} \mathbf{medicinal} \mathbf{slices})$
Ⅰ	Bozhou, Anhui Province	0.295	1.08	5.54	1.15	0.685	22.6	0.301	9.81	0.358	1.84	0.381	0.228	7.53	0.100	95.9	1.42
Ⅱ	Minxian, Gansu Province	0.428	2.54	27.9	1.34	0.0746	0.809	0.0322	23.7	1.41	15.4	0.742	0.0413	0.447	0.0178	22.5	0.00483
Ⅲ	Wanrong, Shanxi Province	0.252	2.61	8.30	0.428	0.707	21.1	0.392	7.00	0.725	2.31	0.119	0.196	5.87	0.109	97.5	0.717
Ⅳ	Dancheng, Henan Province	0.377	1.92	6.40	0.709	0.976	20.1	0.372	12.1	0.617	2.05	0.228	0.313	6.45	0.119	88.3	0.784
Ⅴ	Zhongjiang, Sichuan Province	0.310	1.83	7.35	0.452	0.845	11.2	0.230	15.7	0.928	3.72	0.229	0.428	5.66	0.116	99.2	0.659
Ⅵ	Wanrong, Shanxi Province (1)	0.359	0.923	6.43	0.238	0.800	11.3	0.132	10.7	0.275	1.92	0.0710	0.238	3.38	0.0393	96.0	0.559
Ⅶ	Wanrong, Shanxi Province (2)	0.322	0.842	6.20	0.231	0.781	11.1	0.128	9.83	0.257	1.89	0.0704	0.238	3.38	0.0391	96.7	0.492
Ⅷ	Wanrong, Shanxi Province (3)	0.333	0.904	6.50	0.249	0.821	11.6	0.136	10.0	0.271	1.95	0.0746	0.246	3.50	0.0409	98.1	0.564

DSS: Danshensu; PA: protocatechuic aldehyde; CA: caffeic acid; RA: rosmarinic acid; LA: lithospermic acid; SAA: salvianolic acid A.