Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 3;16(7):1205. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071205

Table 2.

Summary of sample selection and characteristics of the analytical sample.

Sample Information Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 3 Wave 4 Wave 5 Pooled
2006 2007–2008 2009 2011–2012 2013–2015
Survey sample size
 Smoker (Urban) 4815 4844 5585 5560 3860 24664
 Non-smoker (Urban) 1270 1221 1417 1422 1049 6379
 Smoker (Rural) 3957 3957
 Non-smoker (Rural) 1014 1014
 Included: Current smoker (Urban) 4815 4627 5211 5082 3435 23170
 Size of final analytical sample 3214 3186 3849 3727 2446 16422
Characteristics of analytical sample
Age group (%)
 18–35 10.5% 9.6% 14.2% 13.2% 12.4% 12.1%
 36–55 60.0% 61.5% 57.0% 54.9% 50.7% 57.0%
 55+ 29.5% 29.0% 28.8% 32.0% 36.9% 30.9%
Gender (%)
 Male 95.5% 95.5% 95.7% 95.9% 95.0% 95.6%
 Female 4.5% 4.5% 4.3% 4.1% 4.0% 4.4%
Household income (%)
 Low income 87.5% 95.9% 93.2% 92.7% 80.7% 90.6%
 High income 12.5% 4.1% 6.8% 7.3% 19.3% 9.4%
Education (%)
 Low education 44.6% 43.1% 40.3% 39.6% 38.6% 41.3%
 High education 55.4% 56.9% 59.7% 60.4% 61.4% 58.7%
Employment status (%)
 Not employed 36.6% 37.3% 36.8% 40.9% 44.3% 38.9%
 Employed 63.4% 62.7% 63.2% 59.1% 55.7% 61.1%
Smokers using brands by price tier (%)
 I (most expensive) 11.3% 4.2% 7.6% 14.0% 19.9% 10.9%
 II 31.5% 9.4% 2.8% 6.8% 9.6% 11.6%
 III 48.1% 33.3% 47.9% 52.5% 55.7% 47.3%
 IV 8.8% 39.9% 31.7% 20.7% 10.6% 23.2%
 V (cheapest) 0.3% 13.3% 10.8% 5.9% 4.2% 7.0%
City of residence (%)
 Beijing 14.8% 15.9% 14.0% 12.7% 18.7% 14.9%
 Shenyang 12.2% 17.3% 15.6% 15.3% 18.7% 15.6%
 Shanghai 21.5% 21.3% 16.7% 16.4% 24.6% 19.7%
 Changsha 22.2% 19.1% 14.3% 15.2% - 14.9%
 Guangzhou 14.5% 10.9% 7.7% 7.9% 13.7% 10.6%
 Kunming - - 18.0% 16.8% 24.4% 11.7%
 Yinchuan 14.8% 15.5% 13.7% 15.7% - 12.7%