Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 3;16(7):1205. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071205

Table 5.

Trend in Relative Income Price (RIP) of cigarettes (predicted from GEE estimation) by age, gender, household income status, education, employment status and price tier of brands in last purchase of smokers in China, 2007–2008 to 2013–2015.

RIP by Age Group 2006 2007–2008 2009 2011–2012 2013–2015 Change: 2007–2008 to 2013–2015 p-value Difference in Change over 2007–2008 to 2013–2015 in Comparison to Age Group 18–35 p-value
 18–35 9.8% 12.6% 12.2% 8.5% 7.0% −5.6% 0.0000
 36–55 11.5% 12.9% 11.4% 8.5% 6.8% −6.1% 0.0000 −0.5% 0.5980
 55+ 7.4% 8.7% 8.7% 5.8% 4.7% −4.0% 0.0000 1.6% 0.0820
RIP by gender 2006 2007–2008 2009 2011–2012 2013–2015 Change: 2007–2008 to 2013–2015 p-value Difference in change over 2007–2008 to 2013–2015 between male and female p-value
 Male 10.1% 11.6% 10.7% 7.7% 6.2% −5.4% 0.0000
 Female 9.2% 11.4% 9.4% 6.2% 6.0% −5.4% 0.0000 −0.1% 0.9650
RIP by household income status 2006 2007–2008 2009 2011–2012 2013–2015 Change: 2007–2008 to 2013–2015 p-value Difference in change over 2007–2008 to 2013–2015 between low- and high-income p-value
 Low-income 10.8% 12.3% 11.3% 8.3% 6.5% −5.8% 0.0000
 High-income 2.8% 4.1% 3.5% 1.1% 1.2% −2.9% 0.0040 2.9% 0.0050
RIP by educational status 2006 2007–2008 2009 2011–2012 2013–2015 Change: 2007–2008 to 2013–2015 p-value Difference in change over 2007–2008 to 2013–2015 between low and high education p-value
 Low education 11.0% 13.1% 11.6% 8.8% 6.6% −6.5% 0.0000
 High education 9.2% 10.3% 9.9% 6.7% 5.8% −4.6% 0.0000 1.9% 0.0000
RIP by employment status 2006 2007–2008 2009 2011–2012 2013–2015 Change: 2007–2008 to 2013–2015 p-value Difference in change over 2007–2008 to 2013–2015 between not employed and employed p-value
 Not employed 12.1% 13.6% 12.3% 9.3% 7.4% −6.3% 0.0000
 Employed 8.6% 10.2% 9.5% 6.5% 5.5% −4.7% 0.0000 1.6% 0.0040
RIP by price tiers of brands 2006 2007–2008 2009 2011–2012 2013–2015 Change: 2007–2008 to 2013–2015 p-value Difference in change over 2007–2008 to 2013–2015 in comparison to Tier I cigarette brands p-value
 I 16.5% 18.3% 16.6% 12.8% 10.7% −7.6% 0.0000
 II 13.1% 13.7% 13.4% 11.4% 8.9% −4.8% 0.0000 2.8% 0.0350
 III 10.0% 11.7% 11.0% 7.8% 6.4% −5.2% 0.0000 2.3% 0.0290
 IV 7.0% 9.7% 8.2% 5.1% 5.1% −4.6% 0.0000 3.0% 0.0140
 V 6.6% 7.2% 6.4% 4.7% 4.5% −2.7% 0.0150 4.9% 0.0010