Table 1.
A comparison of the electrochemical performance of the F-GO/GCE sensor with other reported sensors for the detection of CA.
| Modified Electrode | Voltammetric Technique | Linear Range (µM) | Limit of Detection (µM) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecularly imprinted siloxanes | DPV | 0.5–60.0 | 0.15 | [74] |
| Electrochemically reduced graphene oxide: Nafion | SWAdSV | 0.1–10.0 | 0.09 | [40] |
| Laccase-MWCNT-chitosan/Au | Amperometric | 0.7–10.0 | 0.15 | [75] |
| Nafion/Tyre/Sonogel-Carbon | Amperometric | 0.08–2.0 | 0.06 | [76] |
| Glassy polymeric carbon | DPV | 0.1–96.5 | 0.29 | [77] |
| Glassy carbon electrode | DPV | 10.0–120.0 | 0.10 | [78] |
| Poly(Glutamic Acid)/GCE | CV | 4.0–30.0 | 3.91 | [21] |
| Fluorine doped graphene oxide/GCE | DPV | 0.5–100.0 | 0.018 | This work |
DPV, Differential pulse voltammetry, SWAdSV, Square wave anodic stripping voltammetry, CV, Cyclic voltammetry, MWCNT, Multi-walled carbon nanotubes, GCE, Glassy carbon electrode.