Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 9;19(7):1686. doi: 10.3390/s19071686

Table 1.

Comparison of the performance of various enzymatic and non-enzymatic glucose sensors with the sensor based on SPCE containing 3-aminophenylboronic acid.

Use of Enzyme Transducer Substrate/Unit of Recognition LOD [µM] Technique of Detection Reference
No SPCE containing 3-aminophenylboronic acid 0.0085 EIS Present work
Yes WS2 nanosheets 2.9 Spectrophotometry [42]
Yes chitosan-coated Fe3O4 NPs 0.43 Chemiluminescence [43]
Yes MoS2-based field-effect transistor 0.3 Measurement of the source-drain current [44]
Yes chitosan/-carrageenan polyelectrolyte complex 5 Square wave voltammetry [45]
Yes WS2 quantum dots 0.3 Fluorescence measurement [1]
No Ni NPs polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) stabilized graphene nanosheets (GNs) with chitosan (CS) 0.03 Chronoamperometry [46]
No NiO NPs electrodeposited on reduced graphene oxide–copper oxide nanocomposite bulk modified carbon ceramic electrode 2.63 Cyclic Voltammetry [47]
No Ag NPs on multiwall carbon nanotubes 0.0003 Amperometry [48]

NPs = nanoparticles.