Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 7.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell. 2018 Dec 27;73(3):601–610.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.016

Table 1.

Cryo-EM Data Collection, 3D Reconstruction, and Model Refinement; Related to Figures 2 and 5

Data Collection SpyCas9-
sgRNA-AcrIIA2
SpyCas9-
sgRNA-AcrIIA2b

Grid CF-2/2–4C-T
(Protochips)
CF-2/2–4C-T
(Protochips)
EM Titan Krios 300 kV,
K2 Gatan Summit
Titan Krios 300 kV,
K2 Gatan Summit
Pixel size (Å) 0.83 1.15
Defocus range (μm) –0.5 to –2.3 –0.7 to –2.5
Defocus determination CTFFIND4 CTFFIND4
Particles picked EMAN and
Gautomatch
Gautomatch

Reconstruction (CryoSPARC)

Accuracy of rotations (°) 1.87 2.035
Accuracy of transitions
(pixel)
1.150 1.393
Final resolution (Å) 3.4 3.9

Refinement (Phenix)

Map CC (entire box) 0.793 0.798
Map CC (around atoms) 0.776 0.791

RMSD

Bond lengths (Å) 0.01 0.01
Bond angles (°) 1.09 1

Ramachandran Plot

% favored 92.65 91.48
% allowed 7.22 8.52
% outliers 0.13 0.00

Molprobity

Clashscore 5.67 6.05

Accession Numbers

EMDB 9066 9067
PDB 6MCB 6MCC