Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 24;19:430. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6730-4

Table 4.

Prediction of depressive symptoms at 2.5 year follow-up (T1) by the SES indicator occupational position

Complete sample (T0) persons without elevateddepressive symptoms at T0 persons with elevated depressive symptoms at T0
PHQ-2 ≥ 2 at T1 (2898/12484) PHQ-2 ≥ 2 at T1 (1455/9605) PHQ-2 ≥ 2 at T1 (1443/2879)
Adj. OR (95% CI) p Adj. OR (95% CI) p Adj. OR (95% CI) p
Occupational position
Model 1
with single indicator
 Occupational position (range 1–7) 0.92 (0.89–0.95) <  0.0001 0.92 (0.89–0.96) <  0.0001 0.98 (0.94–1.03) 0.517
with three indicators
 Occupational position (range 1–7) 0.96 (0.93–0.99) 0.018 0.96 (0.92–1.00) 0.075 1.01 (0.95–1.07) 0.860
Model 2
with single indicator
 Occupational position (range 1–7) 0.94 (0.91–0.97) <  0.0001 0.93 (0.89–0.96) <  0.0001 0.97 (0.93–1.03) 0.310
with three indicators
 Occupational position (range 1–7) 0.97 (0.94–1.01) 0.162 0.97 (0.92–1.01) 0.153 1.00 (0.94–1.06) 0.879

Model 1 adjusted for sex, age, living with partner and major medical diseases3

Model 2 adjusted for sex, age, living with partner, major medical diseases3, PHQ-2 (T0), MH2 of depressive disorder, GAD-2 (T0) and MH2 of anxiety disorder

A: included only the respective SES dimension, e.g. education; B: included all three SES dimensions concurrently as predictor variables

2MH Medical history

3Major medical diseases = any of the following diseases: CVD Cancer, diabetes, COPD Asthma

*boldface indicates p < 0.5 for odds ratios