Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 26;6(1):6. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6010006

Table 4.

Subgroup Analysis for Task Complexity.

Comparison Complexity o SMCR SE 95% CI p SMCRsimple-complex p (∆SMCRsimple-complex) τ τ2
1.2 simple 25 −0.108 0.044 [−0−199, 0.018] 0.021 0.159 0.001 0.224 0.117
complex 103 −0.268 0.044 [−0.357, −0.179] <0.001
1.3 simple 12 −0.130 0.070 [−0.272, 0.012] 0.071 0.295 0.004 0.386 0.063
complex 46 −0.425 0.091 [−0.611, −0.239] <0.001
2.3 simple −0.022 0.047 [−0.117, 0.074] 0.645 0.135 0.029
complex −0.157 0.068 [−0.296, −0.018] 0.028
1.2 vs. 2.3 simple −0.087 0.059 [−0.207, 0.034] 0.152 0.024 0.347
complex −0.157 0.068 [−0.296, −0.018] 0.122

Note. o = number of outcomes, SMCR = standardized mean change with raw score standardization, SE = standard error, CI = confidence interval, ∆SMCRsimple-complex = difference of RT reduction between complex and simple tasks, τ = estimated overall SD of the true effect from the model including the moderator, ∆τ2 = proportion of explained variance of the presented model (model 2) compared to the model without moderators (model 1), as τmodel12τmodel22τmodel12.