Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 23;18:47. doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0667-9

Table 1.

The estimated HR results of the different methods (M1–3) and ECG ground truth HR regarding the clinical trial

(CT-A) selected measurement #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10
Peak detection (HR) (bpm) (M1) 94 86 110 77 89 96 112 95 88 94
Deviation from ECG (in bpm) 28 0 47 3 20 2 5 8 4 44
Single-axis autocorrelation HR (bpm) (M2) 67 79 64 80 69 93 110 86 82 115
Deviation from ECG (in bpm) 1 7 1 0 0 5 7 1 2 23
6-axis autocorrelation HR (in bpm) (M3) 68 69 64 71 68 60 83 85 78 81
Deviation from ECG (in bpm) 2 17 1 9 1 38 34 2 6 57
ECG ground truth HR (bpm) 66 86 63 80 69 98 117 87 84 138

It can be observed that method M2 gives the lowest mean deviation from ECG. Measurements 1–2 and 4–9 are from Dobermans, while 1–2 are in a right lateral and 4–9 in a standing position. The measurements 1 and 5 are from the same dog. Measurements 3 and 10 are from Whippet and Newfoundland dog, respectively (both in a standing position)