Table 2.
The information of the dogs corresponding to the signals in Fig. 4 of the Android smartphone home measurements
| HM-B # | Breed | Weight | Age | Tot. meas. | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Wheaten Terrier | 15 | 12 | 4 | Excellent |
| #2 | Westie | 10 | 8 | 5 | Moderate |
| #3 | Scotish Terrier | 10 | 2 | 4 | Poor |
| #4 | Golden Retriever | 35 | 9 | 1 | Moderate |
| #5 | Maltese | 7 | 14 | 14 | Moderate |
| #6 | Golden Retriever | 32 | 3 | 1 | Moderate |
| #7 | Mixed-breed | 17 | 8 | 7 | Excellent |
| #8 | Shih-Tzu | 7 | 4 | 4 | Excellent |
| #9 | Wheaten Terrier | 20 | 9 | 3 | Excellent |
| #10 | Finnish Lapphund | 25 | 3 | 4 | Excellent |
| #11 | Havanese | 7 | 6 | 4 | Good |
| #12 | Beagle | 17 | 4 | 1 | Good |
| #13 | Golden Retriever | 35 | 5 | 1 | Moderate |
| #14 | Golden Retriever | 30 | 2 | 1 | Good |
| #15 | Shih-Tzu | 7 | 5 | 3 | Moderate |
| #16 | Beagle | 15 | 2 | 2 | Poor |
Visually estimated signal quality of the signals in Fig. 4 made by human expert is also given. Due to motion artifacts, full signals were not evaluated in visual inspection