Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 9;2019:7305832. doi: 10.1155/2019/7305832

Table 3.

Comparison of four clustering algorithms and the proposed algorithm.

Clustering methods Evaluations Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3
K-means Dice 0.9001 0.9316 0.8298
Sensitivity 0.9630 0.9064 0.9424
Specificity 0.9952 0.9984 0.9780
Recall 0.8449 0.9583 0.7412

FCM Dice 0.9137 0.9341 0.9004
Sensitivity 0.9263 0.8905 0.9336
Specificity 0.9971 0.9994 0.9880
Recall 0.9015 0.9823 0.8694

sFCM Dice 0.8169 0.9258 0.9144
Sensitivity 0.7112 0.8645 0.9290
Specificity 0.9968 0.9994 0.9878
Recall 0.9597 0.9965 0.9002

csFCM Dice 0.8069 0.9179 0.9166
Sensitivity 0.6960 0.8540 0.9290
Specificity 0.9971 0.9996 0.9880
Recall 0.9597 0.9922 0.9045

Proposed Dice 0.9261 0.9400 0.8978
Sensitivity 0.9622 0.9184 0.9380
Specificity 0.9971 0.9996 0.9881
Recall 0.8926 0.9625 0.8608